As usual, the original intent of the post gets hijacked into a debate. I guess I am guilty too.....
To attempt to answer BCOD's original question, the miroku Winchesters are excellent. I have them in 16" and 24" barrel lengths (357 &44mag) and I am very happy with them. I sold the 20" short rifle 44 mag because I found the crescent butt a bit brutal on my shoulder after 20 rounds or so.
As far as some of us being keyboard warriors, I cant comment. What I can do is provide my opinion, whether it makes me sound like an arsehole or not.
Browning B92 src 44 mag: very good carbine. accurate. front sight was kind of cheapo. wood was shiny and proud to the metal. didn't like the aluminum barrel bands.
Chiappa trapper 357 mag. nice case hardened coloring. beautiful wood. weak hammer spring. didn't cycle very nice. Maybe I got a bad one?
Rossi trapper stainless 454 casull. only chambered a round about every 3 strokes of the lever. unacceptable for a rifle carried for bear protection. returned to store.
Rossi trapper stainless 44 mag. neat little gun. functioned perfectly. crude finish on action and wood. wood stain leached out onto everything when it got soaked in the rain.
Rossi 20" stainless 44 mag. neat gun. as above but that ugly safety switch ontop of the bolt bugged me every time I looked at the sights.
Original 1907 mfg Winchester 1892 24" round barrel rifle in 25-20, smooth as butter and a beautiful rifle.
There ya go, my two cents worth. If you can afford the new Winchester and can find one, go for it and try to wear it out.