I have an Kimber 8400 in a Montana that is chambered for 338 win mag, and an M70 extreme weather in 7 rem mag. If Kimber made a Montana in 7 rem mag then I would have bought it before the M70. I love the Kimber, its stock is very well designed, well made, strong and soaks up recoil good. The action feels a little "sticky" compared to the M70 but its not a problem. The Kimber is so much nicer to carry and points well. The Kimber is just as accurate as the M70 but only with one bullet type, its thin barrel is a fussy one only liking 210 grain ttsx. The M70 has liked 150 ttsx, 168 vld's and 168 accubond lr's. The Winchester is a lot heavier, I found the trigger not set as good as the Kimber from factory. Side by side my M70 with my brother in laws Cooper excaliber shows me everything that Cooper has done, has been done on my M70. That is a big price difference and a huge savings on my part. The only thing I did to the guns I have was a paint job to get rid of the ugly factory paint. Of the 2 I own, I like the Kimber a little better. Online research has shown me that not many people like Kimber of Oregon, I would avoid them. I think Kimber of America has done a great job of one upping Winchester in fit and finish. If I ever find a Kimber classic select in 7 rem mag then it won't take much to convince me to buy it. Then I might have an M70 to sell. I don't think you could go wrong picking one or the other. Its just if you want to go lighter or not. The Winchester comes with an accuracy guarantee that states if you use premium ammo and glass then you can expect MOA or better, Kimber has no accuracy guarantee, but my Montana is a keeper.