That was sold as a duck gun way back when - when lead shot was still OK for waterfowling. It could still serve the same purpose by getting the choke reamed out, or replacing the barrel with a newer Remchoke barrel.
I have a 26" Remchoke barrel just sitting there doing nothing. Would make a nice duck gun.
Put a layer of thread tape (plumbers tape) under the mag cap or you'll find it will back off with the newer barrel. Theres other, more complicated and expensive solutions but the thread tape works just fine.
My wife and I both duck hunt with Wingmasters. They're the best pump gun ever made.
If the new barrel is for a Wingmaster, there won't be an issue, and no thread tape will be required. If the new barrel is an Express barrel, then the magazine cap will come loose.
The cylinder you found in the butt stock looks more like a recoil reducer than a mag plug to me .does it have any heft to it ?
She's heavy. Found this when I searched the patent number on the cylinder.
https://www.gunpartscorp.com/ad/1287480.htm
Yes, my dad's 1952 vintage Wingmaster had the same weight. You could either put it in the buttstock or the mag tube or leave it out completely depending on your balance preferences. I shot skeet with that gun for a few years in the late 70's, he had a Cutt's on it and the spreader tube was a great skeet choke, unfortunately that Cutt's Compensator was the start of my hearing loss.
Do you know if that weight came with the gun from the factory?
So I've decided to keep the wingmaster and make it my be all and end all shotgun.
I'm looking at either getting the barrel threaded for chokes, OR, buying a new replacement wingmaster barrel from cabelas.
What do you guys reckon?



























