Wolverine .303
Business Member Rep
On June 14th The Interim Clerk of the Privy Counsel has again Filed a Certificate under Section 39 of the Evidence Act to frustrate the court order requiring the AGC to produce the documents the Associate Chief Justice ordered be produced.
This was sent today to the Federal Court and to all applicant counsel.
This is in direct opposition to the court order. This shows the desperation of the Trudeau Cabinet to keep the evidence used to create the OIC of May 1st from public view and from the view of the courts.
To quote other Federal Court judges the Trudeau Cabinet is saying " Trust us , We got it Right ".
What then is so ultra secret that the Associate Chief Justice of the Federal Court cannot view it? Will casting one's eyes upon this turn the viewer to a pillar of salt?
Presently we can only ponder the implications. Definitely this is not the transparent government promised in election campaigns.
It seems the Trudeau Cabinet is above the courts and above the court orders.
This will be examined and fought .
Friends it is now , more than ever , that you must stoke the fire with the needed donations to continue this fight against secret oppression of gun owners.
[URL="https://www.gofundme.com/f/judicial-oic-challenge-part-two]Please make your generous donations now by clicking here!!!! [/URL]
Update from Ed...
"The Video of Runkle of the Bailey was made without consultation with Team Hipwell and does not reflect the views of Team Hipwell.
The are many cases ( over 100) to be reviewed and much to be argued in response to this latest desperate move of the Trudeau Cabinet. The Babcock case is now almost 19 years old and has been considered in over 150 other cases by high courts. There have been many Learned Papers published in Law Journals on the issue and other federal legislation has defined the scope of Cabinet Privacy. All of this will be reviewed in detail by Team Hipwell in formulating a strong response to this latest move by the Attorney General Of Canada and the Trudeau Cabinet.
The analysis of the import of this new attempt to block access is not fully performed in a short video or in the welcome statements of other posters. Yes, I may sound a bit prickly but that reflects the commitment of Team Hipwell to the highest achievements of advocacy which are the result of detailed legal analysis and peer reviewed responses.
These involve senior lawyers and Law Professors who have backgrounds that create a synergistic academic response.
Positive Comments are always welcomed and are listened to."
This was sent today to the Federal Court and to all applicant counsel.
This is in direct opposition to the court order. This shows the desperation of the Trudeau Cabinet to keep the evidence used to create the OIC of May 1st from public view and from the view of the courts.
To quote other Federal Court judges the Trudeau Cabinet is saying " Trust us , We got it Right ".
What then is so ultra secret that the Associate Chief Justice of the Federal Court cannot view it? Will casting one's eyes upon this turn the viewer to a pillar of salt?
Presently we can only ponder the implications. Definitely this is not the transparent government promised in election campaigns.
It seems the Trudeau Cabinet is above the courts and above the court orders.
This will be examined and fought .
Friends it is now , more than ever , that you must stoke the fire with the needed donations to continue this fight against secret oppression of gun owners.
[URL="https://www.gofundme.com/f/judicial-oic-challenge-part-two]Please make your generous donations now by clicking here!!!! [/URL]
Update from Ed...
"The Video of Runkle of the Bailey was made without consultation with Team Hipwell and does not reflect the views of Team Hipwell.
The are many cases ( over 100) to be reviewed and much to be argued in response to this latest desperate move of the Trudeau Cabinet. The Babcock case is now almost 19 years old and has been considered in over 150 other cases by high courts. There have been many Learned Papers published in Law Journals on the issue and other federal legislation has defined the scope of Cabinet Privacy. All of this will be reviewed in detail by Team Hipwell in formulating a strong response to this latest move by the Attorney General Of Canada and the Trudeau Cabinet.
The analysis of the import of this new attempt to block access is not fully performed in a short video or in the welcome statements of other posters. Yes, I may sound a bit prickly but that reflects the commitment of Team Hipwell to the highest achievements of advocacy which are the result of detailed legal analysis and peer reviewed responses.
These involve senior lawyers and Law Professors who have backgrounds that create a synergistic academic response.
Positive Comments are always welcomed and are listened to."
Last edited:
