It’s not a bad rifle per say the hells canyon, it’s definitely overpriced product.
In my circle of friends/coworkers, I am known as a target shooter and get to do many scope installs/sight ins in exchange for a 20$ CCFR donation.
What I can tell, the sweetest shooting hunting profile rifles have all been Tikka, in my personal opinion which some may not like, a Tikka outclasses browning every time (the ones I have personally put my hands on, never put my hands on a Browning sniper special or Browning Fclass rifle yet), and it’s cheaper!
Got 2 bighorn actions here and absolutely live them, nice choice!
I own both X-Bolts and Tikkas and both those rifles have their pros and cons.
- People have complained about the Tikka bolts, some have said they fall apart but I don't know how and have never had it happen to mine.
- The x-bolt trigger is a little more difficult to fine tune but I replaced the spring and cleaned it up and now have it down to about 2.75lbs without any issues.
- The Tikka action/mag may hinder your OAL and bullet seating a bit in the .300WM.
- The X-bolt mags are 100x better than the Tikka mags which are prone to being too loose and popping rounds out, especially if dropped
- The Browning has a better extractor, many gunsmiths say the Sako/Tikka extractors are a bad design as they are short and upon failure can wedge/jam into the steel of the receiver. The browning X-bolt is similar to an M-16 which is supposed to be the best out there.
- The previous comment/complaint about X-Bolt requiring you to push a button to open the action is ridiculous. This is only required if you have the safety on and is a design feature which allows the action to be opened/cycled with the safety still on, like the Sako 85 rifles. The Tikka bolt is locked closed with safety on and safety must be switched off to open the bolt, many prefer the option to keep safety on while opening the action.
- My X-bolt was super easy to develop a load for and is far more accurate than my Tikka which has given me nothing but grief when it comes to acceptable accuracy and load development. I'm now on my 4th or 5th bullet option and have had everything checked by a gunsmith and bedded into a new custom stock with still no luck.
- X-bolt is bedded into the stock from the factory, tikkas are not
- X-bolt stock is more rigid than factory Tikka stock
- The softtouch coating on X-bolt stocks has had durability issues but is grippy in wet weather
- Not necessarily a consideration in your case but X-bolt has at least 3 different action sizes to accommodate the specific cartridges where as the Tikka is a 1-size fits all which is excessively long for standard short and .223 action sizes
- Tikka recoil pad is a hockey puck and needs to be replaced from the get go. X-bolt is one of, if not the nicest factory recoil pads out there.
- X-bolt has a shorter, 60° bolt throw instead of the 90° Tikka.
- Tikka action is one of the smoothest out there
- X-bolt mag is flush and cleaner looking than the Tikka which sticks down (bigger deal to some who carry their rifles a lot)
- Supposedly the X-bolts can be harder to get the barrels off of and can be prone to galling or something but I've never tried myself. I've heard the Tikka barrels can be really torqued on hard too from the factory though so could be a toss up.
- X-bolt ejection port is larger and easier to get rounds in and out of, I find the Tikka more difficult to top load single rounds, especially without a mag in (I often do this at the range for sight in and load development etc)
- I believe the X-bolt has more cartridge/chambering options than the Tikka (again not an issue if you're set on .300WM, in my personal opinion, both these rifles are too light for .300winmag)
- More after market products for Tikkas
All I can think of off the top of my head.
Long story short, I'm considering purchasing another X-Bolt and don't think I'd consider another Tikka, especially when I think about all the frustration I've had trying to get mine to shoot. Getting to the point that I may flog it or rebarrel it.