Zeiss Conquest

[Dustin]

I'm debating buying one. What are the cons of doing so? Would be going on a .300 Weatherby

 

[416]

I have one sitting on my STW and regard it as one of the best scopes l have had the pleasure of owning. Better then any of my Leupold's for clarity and brightness. The heavy duplex posts seem a little big at first but are easy to get used to, and under less then ideal lighting conditions, they stand out good. The only con l could imagine is the wt. which is a little more then comparative scopes, but the quality of the conquest more then makes up for it....my .02 cents

 

[martinbns]

I have two, a 3.5x10x44 and a 3x9x40. I prefer the 3x9, the eye releif is great, it has 4 inches of constant eye relief(it doesn't matter what poer the scope is at), they are extremely bright and clear, I think a fair bit sharper image than a Leupold VX111, I also prefer the standard reticle they offer to the Leupold standard duplex.
Con
the only one I have found is they weigh 3-4 ounces more than the comparable Leupold scope.
I love mine.

 

[Dustin]

I had vicariously heard that there may have been some warranty issues. Now I'm confused.

 

[stubblejumper]

I had a ziess scope damaged in a horsewreck.After sending it away for repairs,I was pleased to receive it repaired free of charge and in short order.Could a person expect any more?

 

[Dustin]

I had a ziess scope damaged in a horsewreck.After sending it away for repairs,I was pleased to receive it repaired free of charge and in short order.Could a person expect any more?

Guess not...I decided to purchase one after all. Will have to get it mounted and see how the gun shoots.