Kimber Montana vs tikka t3

Id buy a new Winchester Model 70 extreme. They are going for about $875 right now if you want a nice CRF. Cheaper then a Kimber and has a Winchester has a good track record. Just a thought.

Cheers!!

Winchester had a consistent track record of making ho-hum rifles for decades, and that's coming from a guy who likes them. They sure made it hard. This last incarnation from FN seems like they finally got their act together.For now.
 
Yeah...you are wrong about that. I've owned numerous rifles that have more than average recoil - .338 WM's, .375 H&H's, .416 RM and others. My .300 WM Mauser M96 (1996) straight pull weighs less than the T3 Lite and, curiously, I can shoot 220gr Partitions at 2850 FPS just fine with it. Next, both the .300 and .338 were tested with numerous powders - H1000, H4831SC, IMR4350, Ramshot Magnum; and numerous bullets - .300 WM - 180gr TSX, 180gr BT, 180/200gr Partition, 200gr Sierra GK; .338 WM - 185gr TTSX, 225gr Hornady SP and 250gr Partition. The .300 WM would barely squeak under 1" with the best load and the .338 WM would do no better than about 1.25". Most loads were in the 1.5" to 2" range.

It is not just me - look on other forums and you will find that the T3 Lite in heavier recoiling chamberings can have accuracy issues. As I mentioned, these are apparently rectified with the installation of the B&C stock.

Lol ok relax I wasn't questioning your abilities. I don't know you. So I was suggesting because as I said they guarantee sub MOA. So if you didn't have success it was just a fluke. And as I said I have all wood stock tikkas not the lite. That would be the same for any rifle in heavy caliber that is light. You need the weight behind it.
 
I had a look at the tikka super light but didn't see one in a 300wsm. Im going to have a look at a Winchester model 70 extreme today as a comparison to the kimber. I used to have one in 308 and it was superbly accurate. I made the mistake of selling it a couple years ago.
 
Id buy a new Winchester Model 70 extreme. They are going for about $875 right now if you want a nice CRF. Cheaper then a Kimber and has a Winchester has a good track record. Just a thought.

Cheers!!

Another better option than the T3

Added bonus of a hinged floor plate instead of the blind magazine on the Kimber.
 
/Users/Linda/Desktop/th_Image.jpg not good at getting my pictures on this site so here goes, this target is from my kimber mountain ascent, these are the firsts groups i,ve shot after barrel break in. the smaller group was my 2nd group. The chambering is 270 win.
 
You can't post like that from your desktop - you need to first download the picture to Photobucket or some other hosting site. And then from there you can use the method you tried.

BTW, how do you like your Mountain Ascent? Have you shot it without the brake?
 
Kimber are a high priced rifle with a terrible track record. Do some research on different forums, you will see many shoot less then desirable groups.

Here are some less than desirable groups from a Kimber Montana 7WSM...

4E87893A-E007-4D4A-A078-1C35910A0CDD_zpsws3finvm.png


F7A05F3D-A542-4DEC-8E0C-9C2C092882C8_zpsjof3zzjj.png


null_zps3892fd3f.png


null-1-1.jpg


null.jpg
 
Tikka is best bang for your buck hands down.

Strongly disagree.
The Weatherby S2 is a superior rifle. The Tikka stock is flimsy and I could feel it flex when i squeezed it' the Weatherby is very strong reinforced fiberglass that does not move at all. The Tikka is too light for any meaningfully strong round; the Weatherby is heavier while still being comfortable. The Tikka mags are expensive while the Weatherby has a dump box. Tikka's stocks ahve crappy checkering while Weatherby has grippy material in the right places. I could go on, but basically I'm totally sold on the S2 and couldn't be happier I bought it instead of the t3.
Tikka's are cheap junk with an accurate barrel and a nice stainless finish. They're too light for the offered chamberings, and other rifles are just as accurate. My S2 will shoot with any Tikka.
 
I love my Mountain Ascent. I haven't shot it without the brake yet but don't feel it will be a problem. i have a montana 7mm wsm and the recoil doesn't bother me. Anyhow, I,m happy with both of my Kimbers, they're accurate. The 2nd group I shot with my mountain ascent all 3 shots were touching. You can't get better than that from a rifle that weighs 5lb 5oz. I like light weight rifles, maybe Im getting old, LOL. Cheers Pete.
 
I love my Mountain Ascent. I haven't shot it without the brake yet but don't feel it will be a problem. i have a montana 7mm wsm and the recoil doesn't bother me. Anyhow, I,m happy with both of my Kimbers, they're accurate. The 2nd group I shot with my mountain ascent all 3 shots were touching. You can't get better than that from a rifle that weighs 5lb 5oz. I like light weight rifles, maybe Im getting old, LOL. Cheers Pete.

...and I hate you out of pure jealousy! ;)
 
Great groups Jordan and dogleg. I know with the best rifle on the market I couldn't shoot that well lol...Id still be leery about dropping that kind of cash on a Kimber. For a few bucks more you can be in a Cooper.

Cheers!!
 
Great groups Jordan and dogleg. I know with the best rifle on the market I couldn't shoot that well lol...I'd still be leery about dropping that kind of cash on a Kimber. For a few bucks more you can be in a Cooper.

Cheers!!

Too bad that few dollars more that you spent on your Cooper couldn't get you an ultralight rifle as they simply have no offering or interest in that market segment. When you start dropping into the sub 6lb scoped realm you had better have a firm grasp of the fundamentals if you hope to shoot small groups. I suspect Cooper doesn't want to go there for this very reason,and I know that a good many of the reports of accuracy problems from Kimbers come from folks with flawed technique off the bench expecting that 6-7lb rifle to make itty bitty groups like their 8lb-9lb Remchester sporter does off the hood of the Chevy.
 
Last edited:
Great groups Jordan and dogleg. I know with the best rifle on the market I couldn't shoot that well lol...Id still be leery about dropping that kind of cash on a Kimber. For a few bucks more you can be in a Cooper.

Cheers!!

Funny thing about that is I have a couple of Coopers. In the case of one the price approachs twice, and the other hovers around 3-4 times what I have in most of my Kimbers. In almost every way I'd still take the Kimbers.
 
I was jealous about your 284 NULA, I guess now we are even, but I still do like your 284. LOL. Cheers pete.

The Ascent is the "new king" (to quote Gatehouse) of the ultralights, and even old Mel would have to acknowledge that fact.
The only thing that keeps the NULA around besides the .284win chambering is that I feel the stock design fits me slightly better.
I can make three touch @100 every now and again when the stars and planets align, but the majority of the time if I'm shooting for groups they usually end up looking awful close to the various Montanas I've owned...somewheres north of around an inch or so. :p

IMG_9034_zps7babdfc9.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Ascent is the "new king" (to quote Gatehouse) of the ultralights, and even old Mel would have to acknowledge that fact.

The stuff that I have read on 24hr CF about the M20B is just really unfortunate - and not just from one person. I was all jacked up to get one...not so much any more.
 
Just got my Kimber Montana 300 Win Mag. Mounted a 3-9x40 leupold canadian edition in a set of Talley lightweights. Total weight is 7.46 Lbs. Not too bad for a 300. Points very nicely, hopefully will be able to get out and try it out.
 
Back
Top Bottom