no surprise Guido that guy guided and learnt from Brian Martin ....
Truth be known, most guided hunters are after a trophy and few return home with the meat; at least in my experience of guiding and knowing a bit of the outfitting business. Tell an American that he can only shoot a young buck or doe, go home with the meat, and it will also cost $5,500 for that hunt........ I don't think that the outfitting business would survive. Their objective, a trophy animal.why would we care what a law breaker thinks of what I've posted here?? I find it awfully strange and quite discouraging that I (among others) post a comment that expresses deep disdain for guides and hunters breaking laws , yet I alone become the 'target' by a couple guys here who I can only assume are associated with or in the guiding business.
I also find it quite discouraging that some guys are so record book hungry that they can't eat 200lbs of game meat in a year. if I knew guys like that I would call THEM out on it instead of post padding here by trying to find some issue with what I posted.
LOL the internet truly cracks me up sometimes.
Truth be known, most guided hunters are after a trophy and few return home with the meat; at least in my experience of guiding and knowing a bit of the outfitting business. Tell an American that he can only shoot a young buck or doe, go home with the meat, and it will also cost $5,500 for that hunt........ I don't think that the outfitting business would survive. Their objective, a trophy animal.
Although I guided for eight years, I don't support outfitting, knowing the insight of it.........that's why I quite. Yes I'm a trophy hunter, but I go home with the animal, and it is consumed.
That name "Patrick Garrett" rings a bell. Is he the fellow that hunts sheep? If it is, not only he contravened several sections of the law, but he and his lawyer out-right lied to the court. The article stated that Garrett did not attend court because he was working to pay off his fine. Bullchit! This Pat Garrett is filthy rich, if not, then he owes the bank $100,000's of dollars for all his "guided" hunts.
That name "Patrick Garrett" rings a bell. Is he the fellow that hunts sheep? If it is, not only he contravened several sections of the law, but he and his lawyer out-right lied to the court. The article stated that Garrett did not attend court because he was working to pay off his fine. Bullchit! This Pat Garrett is filthy rich, if not, then he owes the bank $100,000's of dollars for all his "guided" hunts.
I think you missed my point. If he has a multitude of money, then why did he and his lawyer state that "he had to work to pay off the fine." Your right to a certain degree that he has money, however; social media may eat him-up.He was the youngest guy to complete the NA 29 super slam.....I don't think he worries too much about $$$
LC
That is pretty interesting isn't it. He was also a part of Outdoor Quest TV and maybe still is?
https://www.blogger.com/profile/02250061612698698405
Amazing. Amazing that the hunting ban isn't Canada wide and the same should hold true for the guide prohibitation! While the guide should be depended upon for some of the finer points of law governing the hunt situation, the hunter should also be reponsible for a good working knowledge of the regulations. Leaving the meat or a sizeable edible portion of it behind
is unforgiveable. You harvest the animal for your use, not to 'purposefully' help provide for nature. And, in my opinion, your meat losses from the likes of freezer burn shouldn't be any greater than those of beef you've purchased and frozen. As hunters, it's incumbent upon us, in respect for the game, to obey the applicable rules and regulations and to minimize meat loss, at all stages of the process.
careful...... ardent and bearkilr might single you out for that comment
happened to me a few pages back LOL
careful...... ardent and bearkilr might single you out for that comment
happened to me a few pages back LOL



























