My take on the Marlin 336SS - essentially complete :)

Claven2

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
408   0   2
Location
Onterrible
Yes, I'm aware that haters gonna hate and some guys will not see this for the tool it is. I'm a blued steel and walnut guy myself, but not for guns I use to waterfowl or to hunt with on really dirty days with heavy rain or snow. I was on the lookout for the handiest little lever gun that could fit that bill and still kill anything in Southern Ontario out to about 150 yards or so that didn't need heavy or cumbersome optics.

So I started with a new 2014 Marlin 336SS in .30-30. The gun was fundamentally OK (barrel on straight and action cycled reliably), but needed work to be really right. I bought it on sale at the local gun shop (That Hunting and Fishing Store in Richmond, ON) as it was the only one I could find in stock anywhere, despite it's "issues".

The issues:
- The action was full of machining chips that should have been cleaned out at the factory. Therefore the action cycled like it had sand in it.
- The internals were either "as cast", complete with flashing from the moulds, or were covered in burrs from machining.
- The lever plunger was way too tight and you needed the strength of hercules to open it.
- The floor plate at the front of the receiver wasn't tightened down all the way due to chips trapped between it and the receiver ledge when they contoured the action. After cleaning out the chips, when I tightened the screws, it seated too deeply leaving sharp edges on the receiver sides.
- While not confined to this gun, the new matte finish wood Marlin is using with laser checkering is not too my taste.
- Cross bolt safety. 'nuff said.
- plastic follower. Not terribly confidence-inspiring.

So I tore the gun completely down, polished all the sliding or bearing surfaces on the internals to 600 grit and de-burred everything. Filed off and polished away all casting flash. Complete cleaning too. the lever plunger spring was shortened 1.5 coils and the tip of the plunger given a 1mm radius (vs. the knife-edge it was). The receiver was filed along the bottom to blend perfectly with the floor plate and that area was re-polished to 200 grit to match the rest of the rifle's finish. The cross-bolt safety was replaced with a Beartooth Mercantile dummy-safety that is alway locked in the "FIRE" position and cosmetically looks like a screw with a slot on both sides. No more frustration of hearing the hammer hit an accidentally-left-on safety and scaring game away. The follower was replaced with a stainless leverevolution-compatible follower, also from Beartooth Mercantile.

Next, the rear front and sights were removed and the rear was replaced with a stainless Marbles blank. I installed XS ghost ring sights using the smaller aperture. The walnut stock was replaced with a much slimmer Champion Target synthetic stock from Dowdle Sports. HUGE improvement over the stoke walnut for a SS dirty weather gun. Also much much lighter than the OEM furniture. I swapped the blued rear swivel stud with the original stainless one off my walnut stock set. Looks great IMHO.

Everything now cycles smoothly and reliably, the fit and finish of the metal now about perfect and the trigger breaks like glass at about 4.5lbs. It cycles Leverevolution ammo reliably and there is not fiddly cross-bolt safety to contend with any longer.

I'm pretty happy with this one, and it's not even a JM gun ;) In fact, I think it now cycles smoother than my 1952 JM 336RC in .35 Rem ;) It points and carries REALLY well with the slimmer Win94 style fore stock.

It's really too bad Remlin (or Marlington?) isn't offering this gun already set up similarly to this. I doubt I'm the only one who buys a 336SS for lightweight foul weather performance.









 
I haven;t shot it for groups yet, but will this weekend. With the micro-groove rifling, I'm hoping it does well with 160gn FTX Leverevolution.
 
I think you did a great job, and I know what you mean about the slim forearm. The very early Marlins (e.g., 1889/1894) had slim profile forearms like the one you installed, and they have a great feel, even with long barrels. On the Marlins that I've restocked, I always profile the forearms down so that they flow in line from the front of the receiver. I can only think that perhaps Marlin went with the thicker forearms to prevent cracking.

I sold my last JM-stamped Marlin 336SS last year, but managed to re-acquire another one. It's on its way, and I'm thinking about changing out the pistol grip for a straight stock using parts that I have on hand. But I've also been thinking that it would be interesting to source or make a fiberglass stock set.

Do you have any familiarity with the Ramline synthetic stocks, and if so, how would you compare yours?
 
Ramline is no longer in business, they were bought out by Champion. The moulds are not identical anymore though, the Champion stocks are a little different, I'm told, but I don't have a Ramline to compare it to.
 
Given the cost-cutting measures that you've documented, I find it hard to believe that the original stock was actually walnut. Hell, being actual wood instead of compressed sawdust seems feels like a bit of a stretch
 
The stocks are actually decent walnut these days, but finished matte instead of gloss and checkered with a laser, which isn't as crisp as cut checkering, but is better than pressed checkering.

the cheaper models are stocked with laminate nowadays.
 
I did the same with my 336ss a few years ago. The only rust issues I've had with it were the ejector and mag spring. I think mine is an 09 model, and has always shot well. Lol I even loaded up nosler bullets in the silver cases to match the rifle.
 
Thanks for taking the time to do the write-up, and looks/sounds like you did a good job. I've seen a couple newer Marlins, and didn't care for the laser'd checkering. Neither do I like the cross bolt safety. I had a stainless 1894 .44 and the safety got me twice. The second time was in the evening after a long day in the bush and my co-worker and I ran into two bears within 20 mins. We were still finishing the job and had walked up a thickly brushed creek valley. We had to return back down the valley and I walked in front with the Marlin 'ready to go' in my hands. I very rarely do this, but one of the bears had bluff charged us, and the other had spooked me out. Well I did notice the subtle 'click' as the side of my thumb engaged the safety. But if I hadn't, and had desired to use the gun, I might have been disappointed. Otherwise I really like the 336 and 1894 Marlins.
 
I was interested in a 1895 cb. I thought the newer models had most of the quality problems fixed . The issues with cracked receivers and the problems like you had.
Can't find one in stock anywhere anyways.
 
Most Marlins I see now are just fine. If you aren't into tweaking, buying in person becomes key.

I'm more willing to fix a stainless gun though as there is no rebluing requirement when you polish, file, etc.
 
Nice work Claven.
I didn't know that Champion took over the Ramline plastic stock market.... looks like they improved the recoil pad which on my ramline winchster stock is just a plastic cover.
 
As a younger guy who is into the lever guns, and lives somewhere wet, I have to say damn that is nice rifle, why is nothing offered commerically in synthetic stocks like that? Seems like it would help lever guns gain back some market share

The only things I've seen with a more modern look are the very expensive take downs in pistol calibers.
 
Back
Top Bottom