The Ultimate North American Hunting Round?

Best North American Hunting Round

  • .270 Winchester

    Votes: 70 8.4%
  • .270 WSM

    Votes: 11 1.3%
  • .30-06

    Votes: 358 42.8%
  • .35 Whelen (tough to find, yes, but solid)

    Votes: 19 2.3%
  • 7mm Rem Mag

    Votes: 67 8.0%
  • .300 Win Mag

    Votes: 147 17.6%
  • .338 Win Mag

    Votes: 67 8.0%
  • .375 Mag (H&H or Ruger)

    Votes: 54 6.5%
  • .300 Ultra Mag (tough to find, but hard to argue with)

    Votes: 8 1.0%
  • .300 WSM

    Votes: 35 4.2%

  • Total voters
    836
I voted 30-06 for obvious reasons.

Should have added too the .308 isn't quite as good as the .30-06, and the .30-06 is so uniquitous it was hard to justify including .308 when it's an obvious second and even third choice in .30 cal behind the -06 and Win Mag as an all around continental cartridge. Figured with the popularity of the .308 the snub should be properly explained. And for those who say .30-06, remember the .300 will do everything it does and more, with the added range and power.

Meh... If you know how to shoot properly and aim for the right spot the 30-06 will get it done. Buffalo, bear... etc, etc.
 
Of the rounds you list, I pick the 300 WM over the 30-06, but only for the reason that it can handle a 200 grain bullet just a bit better than a 30-06 for the big/heavy/mean stuff.
 
There's a bit of a secret society of hunters in North America that have taken the NA29 with a 300Wby so definitely hard to argue that it wouldn't do the job.

He hasn't come close to rounding out the twenty-nine, but it serves him pretty damn well. I saw its merits on the humble Impala of all things, it's good for a stretch.
 
Why do we bother with this same question every few weeks or months? Half the guys who answer ignore the actual question and choose whatever cartridge the one rifle they own is chambered in (even if it is poor choice for anything). The second half also ignore the question, and choose whichever cartridge they feel is perfect for the hunting they do, as though there is nothing else to hunt. The third half (!) consists of guys with broad experience, with both guns and hunting, and they choose the "best" answer to the question asked, based on logic and empirical evidence.

Obviously, the guys in the "third half" come closest to answering the question as asked. And, maybe not as obviously, it's pretty accurate to state that any cartridge on the list will suffice. BUT...by the time a hunter has attained some varied experience, used a bunch of cartridges/rifles, shot a selection of different critters, travelled around a little and generally sampled a bit of variety, the odds are good that he will be making a choice based on some combination of effectiveness, sentimentality, personal preference and just plain "'cuz I just like it!"

...Not that there's anything wrong with that! :)
 
Such a small load selection....No classic ones like .30-30 Win., .358 Win., 6.5x55 Swede, .303 British, .45-70...Yada, yada, yada.

For this limited selection, I'll gladly go 30-06.

.45/70 is a legitimate energy choice, but a tough go on antelope and mountain sheep...
 
Slight derail maybe...but could somebody explain what benefit a .308 would have over a .30-06? I see some posters wishing it had been included...

I suspect every species in NA has at one point in time been dispatched (out of desperation or necessity) by a headshot with a .22LR... Likely also with a .303, .30-30, .45-70, etc. etc..... But I wouldn't purposely head out after the larger/dangerous species with anything less than .300WM today... It isn't a why...it's a why not
 
.45/70 is a legitimate energy choice, but a tough go on antelope and mountain sheep...

No worries for a feller that shoots BPCR matches. Back in the day, they used the .45-70 out to 1200 yds. Took a bit for the boolit to impact the target though. Most folks these days haven't practiced long range shooting with lower velocity big bores, or lower velocity anything for that matter.:runaway:
 
Why do we bother with this same question every few weeks or months? Half the guys who answer ignore the actual question and choose whatever cartridge the one rifle they own is chambered in (even if it is poor choice for anything). The second half also ignore the question, and choose whichever cartridge they feel is perfect for the hunting they do, as though there is nothing else to hunt. The third half (!) consists of guys with broad experience, with both guns and hunting, and they choose the "best" answer to the question asked, based on logic and empirical evidence.

Obviously, the guys in the "third half" come closest to answering the question as asked. And, maybe not as obviously, it's pretty accurate to state that any cartridge on the list will suffice. BUT...by the time a hunter has attained some varied experience, used a bunch of cartridges/rifles, shot a selection of different critters, travelled around a little and generally sampled a bit of variety, the odds are good that he will be making a choice based on some combination of effectiveness, sentimentality, personal preference and just plain "'cuz I just like it!"

...Not that there's anything wrong with that! :)

:)
.
 
No worries for a feller that shoots BPCR matches. Back in the day, they used the .45-70 out to 1200 yds. Took a bit for the boolit to impact the target though. Most folks these days haven't practiced long range shooting with lower velocity big bores, or lower velocity anything for that matter.:runaway:

Lol the issue is guessing which direction the crittur will walk from the time the trigger is pulled until the bullet impacts... three steps is a long ways!:) The BPCR targets have the decency to hold still at least
 
300 Win. It could described as a performance cartridge for people who want performance but aren't particularly interested in guns. It's everywhere, works just fine and if it isn't the gun nuttiest pick for a certain application it's probably second. Few people even try to argue it's efficiency. its not my personal favourite, but I don't have the slightest interest in doing everything with one rifle. I do have 4 of them, and everything else on the list as well.
 
Why do we bother with this same question every few weeks or months? Half the guys who answer ignore the actual question and choose whatever cartridge the one rifle they own is chambered in (even if it is poor choice for anything). The second half also ignore the question, and choose whichever cartridge they feel is perfect for the hunting they do, as though there is nothing else to hunt. The third half (!) consists of guys with broad experience, with both guns and hunting, and they choose the "best" answer to the question asked, based on logic and empirical evidence.

Obviously, the guys in the "third half" come closest to answering the question as asked. And, maybe not as obviously, it's pretty accurate to state that any cartridge on the list will suffice. BUT...by the time a hunter has attained some varied experience, used a bunch of cartridges/rifles, shot a selection of different critters, travelled around a little and generally sampled a bit of variety, the odds are good that he will be making a choice based on some combination of effectiveness, sentimentality, personal preference and just plain "'cuz I just like it!"

...Not that there's anything wrong with that! :)

You hit a lot of nails on the head, as for the why, well very little of consequence of course happens anywhere on the internent. When it's online the answer is usually "entertainment", and it's for that I started this good old pig wrestling match. So far so successful, you broke it down pretty well to three groups one can certainly recognize. I also think as you go the original premise and question is forgotten, slipping into two of the groups you mention.
 
I chose 300 Win mag, since it is for everything in North America. I don't own one, but ammo is common, and I feel it would be s good compromise between power for Polar and Grizzly bear, and not being crazy overkill for smaller animals(like a 338 or bigger might be). I don't own one, and don't need more than a 30-06.
 
I voted 300 Win Mag. It has plenty of reach, versatile bullet options, and is pretty shooter friendly. A 180gr Nosler Accubond @ 3000 fps is guaranteed bad for any critter in NA inside 500 yards.

Off the options listed in the poll, I'd vote 338-06. More bullet weight than the 30 cal but with a 210gr TTSX @ 2750 fps, still reaches 400y with ease and less recoil than the 300 mag. Rifle would hold an extra round capacity too
 
Back
Top Bottom