Also methinks the price of them should be half given their construction.
Yep, budget rifle with budget features for a mid grade price.
Also methinks the price of them should be half given their construction.
^^^This
I have a T3 in 30-06. Great, accurate, lightweight walking rifle. So lightweight that it kicked pretty bad for a 06. A $50 Limbsaver cured that.
Of the 4 the Browning is the nicest, just the least gunsmith friendly.
Are Brownings hard to work on for Gunsmiths? They seem to be great rifles with a lot of features for the money (hand reamed chambers, adjustable triggers, many models have bedded actions, etc.) but they don;t seem to be too popular on this forum for some reason...![]()
Yep, budget rifle with budget features for a mid grade price.
Firstly, i am not a gunsmith, secondly i did not stay at a Holiday Inn express last night.
Lastly, from my gunsmith...apparently the thread between barrel and receiver is extremely fine, and the trigger is permanent. So if one wants to change or rebarrel it is very easy to cross thread and ruin either/and the barrels and receiver. The permanent trigger is neither easy to adjust, or easy to work with too bed a rifle. This is just second hand, but from a source i trust. Personally i have found them to be good quality, great fit and finish, and very accurate out of the box
I cannot agree with this comment at all. The stock is definitely cheap tupperware but the rest of the Tikka T3 is a finely crafted piece of equipment and well worth the price when compared to other firearms in a comparable range. The cheap stock hinders nothing about the rifle and perfectly fits the bill for light weight and functional.
I believe the Tikka is the best value over the other options for a hunting rifle because:
1. Silky smooth action that is very quiet
2. Fantastic crisp trigger that can be adjusted to your liking
Replacement Magazines are stupidly expensive I won't argue that one. These mags are very small and lightweight which is very good.
I really like savages but I would put this on the bottom of this list for a hunting rifle because their actions are horribly rough, clunky and noisy and have very heavy bolt lift. The magazines are also finicky as heck to change in a hurry.
I live in the North where everybody hunts and the Tikkas are becoming extremely popular and I have never met someone who bought one and was unhappy with it. They are proving themselves in the heat, the cold, the rain and the snow.
As for me, I seriously do not like the Tikka recoil lug which is basically the same system as the Axis and a few others.
Budget features on Tikka:
1) Single action length regardless of cartridge chambered.
fair enough, not an issue for me as I use 7RM
2) Recoil lug is a part of the stock
Who cares it works
3) Plastic bolt shroud, bottom "metal," mag feed lips and mag catch.
Bolt shroud is crap I agree, the rest works and is light
4) Tubberware stock
yup, but functions well
5) Very thin Bluing on the blued models
we are comparing stainless models here so not applicable.
What is the weight of the x-bolt stainless with magnum chamberings?
Mag: 6lbs 13oz
Short Mag: 6lbs 8oz
for anyone that simply can't live with the "plastic" bolt shroud and bottom "metal" on their Tikkas, there are kits available to replace the plastic with actual metal. Bolt handle/knob included. It's roughly another $250 but hey, that's what you saved to begin with.![]()
To me the Savage is worth the extra $50 over the Remington because it's a Savage, and although the 700 is a sound design and has been the industry benchmark for much of the model's life, a Remington is still only a Remington.




























