the_klenzer
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Vancouver, BC
Awe sheet I've been outed!
Actually... You've seen pretty much everything Tavor related, have you ever seen one with a bayonet mount?
Advice Regarding Tacticooling Tavor...
- Thread starter int3grity
- Start date
Actually... You've seen pretty much everything Tavor related, have you ever seen one with a bayonet mount?
onetwentyish
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- East Central AB (AKA Northern Texas)
- Location
- North West of Superior
'Looks', highly overrated, KISS, add stuff that works, besides, when it comes time to sell, who wants your custom bits? I want my own custom bits.......which LOOK even kewler.
onetwentyish said it all 'lol'
onetwentyish said it all 'lol'
This. The Tavor's weak point is the trigger. It is terrible. The only trigger I've experienced that's worse is the VP70. Get a good drop in trigger, and there seem to be a number of options now, and the rifle is pretty HSLD out of the box.
contact wolverine. maybe some left.
It's difficult to determine exactly when the trigger on the T97 will break without practice, but it's very light and very smooth. I actually prefer it to the stock trigger on the Tavor.
TV-PressPass
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Mountains, Alberta
Keep in mind that when we talk about "stock triggers" in the Tavor, we're all talking about different things. The trigger you get in a gun off the shelf today is a very different creature than the one in my early import gun. Beyond the trigger pack assembly and springs, even the physical trigger is different.
If you look at the biiig version of this image you can see the flat faced trigger that was part of the original imports. Compare that to the rounded one that's likely in your LGS.
Forget the tacticool crap. If you got money to burn, spend it on an upgraded trigger, a quality optic like a Leupold MK IV, Elcan Spectre, S&B Short Dot, etc.(no cheap POS Chinese crap) Add a half dozen reliable magazines and as much American black eagle ammo as you can afford and hit the range. Look to the IDF, their rifles aren't festooned by pounds of superfluous accessories.
I find the fore end helps at the range gives me more space up front to get bags underneath in a comfortable position. If the man wants lights and lasers let him get them, I'm a paper puncher and on occasion gopher hunter so lights and muzzle breaks seem unnecessary. Same could be said for the 3000 dollar rifle To shoot gophers but to each their own.
onetwentyish
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- East Central AB (AKA Northern Texas)
If it a flash hider is what it was designed to be, that is likely 90%+ what it will do.
If its a designed as a brake, thats what it will do 90%+.
If its disigned as a comp, thats about 90%+ what it will do.
Imagine a triangle diagram, each point represents a particular design feature (Brake, Comp, Flash Suppression). Now draw a point in the center of your triangle as a marker of the capability of your bare barrel with no muzzle device. Now take the marker and mark where on the Diagram you want to be to determine what your looking for.
Its largely give and take. Brakes spit fire but reduce recoil, flash hiders dont give much (if any) added control but con almost completely mitigate muzzle flash, comps dont flash suppress or really help recoil but does certainly mitigate muzzle movement.
onetwentyish
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- East Central AB (AKA Northern Texas)
I am currently running a Ares Armor Effin-A MKII Tuneable comp, but I look forward to trying a Lantac Dragon or Surefire brake at some point.
Its important to note that my above explanation isn't entirely correct, there are some exceptions, but it helps you kind of figure out the general direction you want to go.
Its important to note that my above explanation isn't entirely correct, there are some exceptions, but it helps you kind of figure out the general direction you want to go.
