"I need 6mm bullets for reloading..."
There, that wasn't so hard.
fixed it for you
"I need 6mm bullets for reloading..."
There, that wasn't so hard.
"I need bullets for reloading..."
There, that wasn't so hard.
Do you ever buy new cases? It's only reloading, if the cases haven't already been loaded.
The point being that when I ask for bullets, the clerk should know that I want bullets. If I wanted ammunition, I would ask for ammunition.
It's easier to simply use the correct terminology, as in cartridge when referring to cartridge, and caliber when referring to caliber, and bullets when referring to bullets, than it is to use incorrect terminology, and then have to use extra wording such as "for reloading" , or go into further explanations, so that people know exactly what you are talking about.
And me.
How about "Do you have any Nosler 7mm 140 grain Ballistic Tips?
I have asked for 140gr 7mm TTSX bullets, and the clerk asked if I wanted just projectiles, or if I wanted ammunition for the 7mmremmag, loaded with the 140gr TTSX. The fact that some people use "7mm" in place of 7mmremmag adds to the problem.
Many years ago now, Colonel Whelen opined that should one be burdened with the choice between a .270 and a .30/06, he should choose the .280 Remington which is slightly better, but not so much better that if you need to sideline a good .270 or '06 in favor of the .280. I'm of the opinion that it's wide range of bullet weights makes the .30/06 more versatile, and thus a better cartridge, than it's younger siblings.
My own personal opinion, the .270 is by far the most overrated round out there. It can do nothing that the good old tried and true .30-06 can't do better. In my own experience, the .06 is king
Either one will work. You have a great selection of factory ammo with either one. The 30-06 will recoil a bit more, the 270 will shoot a bit flatter. The 30-06 has a slight advantage if you reload because of the wider range of bullet weights that can be used. It's really a toss up if your only hunting deer or moose.




























