I agree that some mil surplus rifles that are in excellent shape , all matching numbers and no signs of repair(s) should be left untouched due to long term collector value .
That said , if a person like my self wants a shooter and wants it to still " look Good " then redoing the stock and refinishing the metal work ect does no real harm in the short or long term as it is a " Shooter grade "
I was Very lucky to have a fellow CGNer will to trade me one of his STV 40's still in the grease for one of my rifles .
He showed me the stock repairs and forced matched parts via excellent pictures before we made the deal .
It was exactly what I wanted , a STV 40 shooter that I could tinker without worrying about long term value .
You will see in the pics below that both sides of the stock had repairs and on the bottom left side near the mag the repair was glued incorrectly and the wood was sticking out ,
it was only a matter of time before it got caught on something and break off . So a full stock redo was in order to fix that repair and make the other repairs less noticeable .
Well the bolt and cover got the toilet bowl cleaner cleaning too , no polishing was required .
So I hope the Purest's don't burn me at the stake for this post !!
The first three pic's are the Before the make over , the last 4 are the completed make over .
YES ! I am Very happy with my new STV 40 and many thanks goes out to the great CGNer who traded it to me !