My new antique Swiss 1882 Revolver

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wanted to share my new purchase, a well-used Swiss 1882 revolver in antique range 1300s. Got it for half of what a perfect condition one runs. It's got a pristine barrel surprisingly, the finish is gone with minor pitting and old traces of black paint on it. It works perfectly and the internals look like new! I love the workmanship of these old swiss firearms. Was wondering if anyone could tell me any more about it, especially the symbols in front of the cylinder on the left side.

I also want to make this into a revolver I could use regularly and since it has little collector value and Swiss 7.5mm is rare and I don't reload, anyone have an idea of a common caliber this would make a good conversion to?

Cheers :)

As I am not an expert, I will not comment on any potential 'collector value' but I think you can see from the responses to your post that there is a significant amount of 'collector sentiment' for your antique firearm.

I have one of these as well and they are truly a wonderful thing. I submit for your interest a picture of my own below:

nIydsl.jpg

That isn't a plum patina on the barrel. It is some sort of reflection. The barrel is as lovely a blue as the frame.​


I am an advocate of property rights and I believe that it is an inherent right that individuals are allowed to own property. If you believe the first part then it only makes sense that an individual is permitted to do as they wish with their property. If it is your desire to convert your Swiss 1882 to 22lr or any other caliber then that is your prerogative. However responsibility is also an aspect of owning property and some responsibilities are different to some than others.

Some responsibilities related to ownership are defined by law. A dog my be your property but that doesn't give you license to abuse it. Other responsibilities regarding ownership are assumed by ourselves to a greater or lesser degree as we see fit. Betty may be diligent about cleaning her sks after shooting corrosive ammo and Bobby may not...

I think that anyone who has spent time collecting anything has an 'ah-ha!' moment where they realize that they are only the most recent owner of an object and if the object is truly unique and interesting then you probably have a responsibility to preserve the object at least as well as those that came before you. We are only here for a little while after all. There is a word for this behavior. It is to 'curate'. If you work in a museum you would be referred to as a curator.

In firearms like stamp collecting there are extremes of interpretation. If you really need to shoot your gun without reloading and are convinced that converting it to another caliber is the only solution...

Then I don't suppose it would help much if I detailed a story similar and told you of those regrets...

On another hand, all of the Swiss 1882 revolvers that I have found seem to be in exceptional condition. The fact that yours shows more wear, is unique from that point of view. Anything you can do to document it's history makes it more interesting...
 
Last edited:
When at least 5 people in this thread posted that you are in the wrong, and conversion is wrong thing to do, then it must be true. It is wrong thing to do to antique firearm, period.
As you yourself stated that everyone is entiteled to do what they please with their property, then let the OP decide what to do. Suggestions were given and opinions were made, leave it at that.


You must be thick, go back and reread the original post... I answered the original posters question. Something you've failed to do.

Now if name calling is your issue, I belive "mouth breather" was how YOU started with that.
 
When at least 5 people in this thread posted that you are in the wrong, and conversion is wrong thing to do, then it must be true. It is wrong thing to do to antique firearm, period.
As you yourself stated that everyone is entiteled to do what they please with their property, then let the OP decide what to do. Suggestions were given and opinions were made, leave it at that.


Sorry, bud. It's you that is wrong... The op asked about conversion. I answered. It's his gun and his business.

I won't even get into the foolishness that is, "five people said it so it must be true" lmfao. That's rich.

As for it being "wrong" period.... Well sorry but it seems we don't see eye to eye on that one. I firmly belive that a free person is free to do as they wish with their privately owned property. I own a lovely remington rolling block pistol. It was poorly converted to .22lr, then completly restored in .38spl. It's a wonderful piece that's still providing enjoyment 150 some odd years after it was originally Made in .50.... Again, you can enjoy your toys your way, I'll enjoy mine as I wish in a legal and safe fashion. I will continue to support others rights to do the same. If you can't handle this you might be best to move to North korea.
 
Sorry, bud. It's you that is wrong... The op asked about conversion. I answered. It's his gun and his business.

I won't even get into the foolishness that is, "five people said it so it must be true" lmfao. That's rich.

As for it being "wrong" period.... Well sorry but it seems we don't see eye to eye on that one. I firmly belive that a free person is free to do as they wish with their privately owned property. I own a lovely remington rolling block pistol. It was poorly converted to .22lr, then completly restored in .38spl. It's a wonderful piece that's still providing enjoyment 150 some odd years after it was originally Made in .50.... Again, you can enjoy your toys your way, I'll enjoy mine as I wish in a legal and safe fashion. I will continue to support others rights to do the same. If you can't handle this you might be best to move to North korea.

That's good, good man. Saying sorry is the first step in admitting it. keep up good job.
 
Yes, it's his property, and he can do as he wants with it. Nobody is debating that.

And if he can find a competent smith to do the conversion well, it's up to him. To me it's a bit of a shame, but that's just my opinion, but i'm as entitled to it as you are yours Deuce. He asked a question on what is largely a collecting/collectors forum, so that's the sort of answer he's going to get.

The only downside to this whole thread is that now i want a swiss revolver, and i can't afford one at current.....i stick my tongue out at all of you with those pretty pretty swiss revolvers and holster sets. sob...
 
I am going to ask people once and once only to quit sniping back and forth over conversion, particulary in calling poster's "thick in the head". While I am in the "don't convert" camp, I also think people need to consider the implications of what calibers they are suggesting. At the moment for example, 22 magnum is not on the "no go" list but it is also a common readily available cartridge and I think the more we publicly talk about converting to common commercially available cartridges or chambers which permit the shooting of "no go" calibers, the more likely we are to see the number of cartridges on the list to increase. There already has been a police response of creating policies that only certain categories of antiques can be modified and retain or attain antique status. Let's not make those policies more inclusive

cheers mooncoon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom