.... and then there's social, fiscal and spiritual Fuddism.Depends on whether you're speaking in urban, suburban, or medical terms.
Ted
Yukoner said:My current project is, hang on, a lightweight 340 Wby Mag in a McMillan stock. It will be a long range Woods Bison rifle for carrying while hunting on snowshoes.
Ted
Boomer, what is the date of the publication you posted on Peters internal belted bullets?
The as states Peters is a division of Remington. Looking up the Peters history, one source states Remington bought out Peters in 1934, while another source states it was 1944.
I was always under the impression Remington brass said R-P due to the Remington/Peters connection. I'm not read up on the subject entirely, nor do I hold a Fudd card, so it ain't gospel.
What 300 H&H iron are you taking to the range Mr Wagner?
Ted, can you shoot those over a chronograph, to see just what puny ammunition we used to have?
Bruce
I wouldn't shoot that. Too classic. Keep it for the 'Fudd Museum'.
I have some old Remington brass for my H&H and its headstamped REM - UMC 300 MAGNUM .
No idea how old it is, perhaps pre-war ?

I have some 30-06 brass with that headstamp. We are Fudd Cousins!
Ted
I'll take it.
I wouldn't shoot that. Too classic. Keep it for the 'Fudd Museum'.
Ted, can you shoot those over a chronograph, to see just what puny ammunition we used to have?
Bruce
How about we pull the bullets, replace them with some 220 gr Hornady RNs, and chronograph them? That should give us a pretty good idea.
Ted

Definately a nice clean look.
It certainly looks to be in very nice condition and is a lot sharper looking than my old 721.
If there ever was a more plain looking rifle than my old Remington I have yet to see it, but is probably the most reliable rifle I will ever have.
Its put more game in our freezers than all of my other rifles together.




























