Revolver shotgun for your AR15

six12-shotgun-ar.jpg

6-Twelve-standalone-2.jpg

Bullpup... silenced...revolver...shotgun.... must sell children....
 
Here, I'll embed it:

[youtube]aSdWsXkc0gw[/youtube]

There goes your swing weight.
But that's actually kind of neat.

The fact that you can make is stand alone make it that much more useful.

It might actually be legal up here, but most likely restricted.

It would make 3 gun pretty interesting.
 
If you can point out where the "magazine" on that shotgun is, I'd be curious to hear it.

With our system, It would probably be called a "high capacity" removable rotary magazine. /sarcasm for those who don't know.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the idea that it is removable makes the cylinder a magazine. Even though it has six "chambers" - see the next sentence where I define magazine according to the FA, which I don't care about since in most books a magazine is a device that holds cartridges and is inserted into the action of a firearm. Hence a question for discussion, not me telling people that a cylinder is a magazine....

I know that By definition "cartridge magazine" means a device or container from which ammunition may be fed into the firing chamber of a firearm;

and this cylinder does not "feed" ammunition into a chamber, so does not meet the criteria.

It is something that is not really specified by the current legal wording... so... Canadian default... SCARY BAD GUN! Again sarcasm.... In case you didn't know.

Don't get me wrong I want one. it seems pretty cool.

Either way, a factory 5 round version would be convenient.
1. Easier math when buying ammo boxes.
2. possibly slightly smaller/compact
3. Less likely to be deemed prohib since 5 is a "magic" number that makes us all safer (sarcasm)
4. if your can't get the job done with 5 rounds of 12ga, you can't with six.
 
Last edited:
With our system, It would be called a high capacity removable rotary magazine.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the idea that it is removable makes the cylinder a magazine. Even though it has six "chambers"

It is something that is not really covered by the current legal wording... so... Canadian default... SCARY BAD GUN!

Don't get me wrong I want one.

Man that is a lot of assumptions to come up with an opinion based no where in legal literature.

If it isn't covered by the legal wording, it isn't regulated, and thus legal. Laws say what you can't do, not what you can.
 
Sure it doesn't have the CUP of a .357Mag, but I still wouldn't want anything (had, forearm, cheek, depending on configuration), near that forward gap. Cool way to reduce length and height.
 
Back
Top Bottom