This comes from the Ontario MNR's 'Ask the CO' site. Question #163 was about target shooting on Crown Land. If you're found with a firearm in the bush(forget a .22 for keeping big nasty beasties at bay. Not that Yogi is interested in you.) you are assumed to be hunting. Onus of proof to the contrary is on the accused. The whole thing is at the discretion of the CO.
"Section 109 of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 states that: In a prosecution under this Act in respect of hunting or trapping, (a) proof that a person possessed, in an area usually inhabited by wildlife, a firearm, trap, decoy or other hunting or trapping device, a ferret or a specially protected raptor or other bird of prey, is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the person was hunting or trapping, as the case may be…"
You can apply for an ATC, but you'll be unlikely to get it. Doesn't come from the RCMP either. Ontario only hands out Wilderness Carry permits to working trappers and prospectors. Not hikers.
"Section 109 of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 states that: In a prosecution under this Act in respect of hunting or trapping, (a) proof that a person possessed, in an area usually inhabited by wildlife, a firearm, trap, decoy or other hunting or trapping device, a ferret or a specially protected raptor or other bird of prey, is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the person was hunting or trapping, as the case may be…"
You can apply for an ATC, but you'll be unlikely to get it. Doesn't come from the RCMP either. Ontario only hands out Wilderness Carry permits to working trappers and prospectors. Not hikers.