I think 300 blk is more suited for you than 7.62X39
Id like to try it, 300 was on my mind for a while but I switched to wanting 7.62x39 more. As I believe it should be more different then 5.56 compared to 300. If I understand correctly 300 is just a cut down and re-sized 5.56 case with a larger projectile and different load. And from what I read the real beauty of that round is really found when shooting suppressed. Also 300 is hard to find, expensive is one thing but if I cant get an ammo easily I dont want it....I am not the kind of person that goes to the range and shoots 50rounds and goes home. Every caliber I have I buy boxs of 1000, if I cant buy it by the 1000 case I dont even buy it
Personally I do not do any long distance shooting yet, I have only been to indoor ranges so far. My range is 25 yards, and so far all my guns are either standard or compact handguns or short barreled rifles. In a normal trip to the range I will shooting minimum 300-700 rounds at about $200-300 ammo cost. This is not a cheap hobby for me, I am not in the stage of trying to save money yet, Im new so I pay alot to shoot new stuff...
Call me crazy but I spend $55 to shoot 3 rounds of 50 BMG, and I paid $90 for 25 rounds of 50 AE, just to try them out in range guns. Yeah its kinda crazy but I really wanted to shoot those iconic calibers and guns, you only live once and it was worth it for me
To be honest at the rate Im going at, I'll eventually have one of each caliber, hard part is deciding which one to get first