Range Report - Henry Frontier (H001T)

Grawfr

BANNED
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
BANNED
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Sol III
I was at the range today with my Henry Frontier (model H001T). It has a cheap $45 Simmons fixed-magnification 4x scope. The octagonal barrel makes it a little front-heavy, but its weight helps giving the rifle a very light recoil and it just look great on a lever-action.

LoqHXBr.jpg



I was shooting from a bench, with a rest under the tubular magazine and a sandbag under the stock. I shot several brands of ammunition to try to see what the difference would be. Happy to say that there was not a single misfeed, misfire, dud or bad extraction. 100% reliability. Here's the results at a glance for 20-rounds groups:

LRN = Lead Round Nose (aka "Solid"); CPHP = Copper Plated Hollow Point; CPRN = Copper Plated Round Nose

Winchester Wildcat 40gr LRN~5 MOA
American Eagle 40gr LRN~5 MOA
American Eagle 38gr CPHP~4 MOA
Federal Game-Shok 40gr CPRN~3 MOA
CCI Mini Mag 36 gr CPHP~3 MOA
RWS Special Match 40gr LRN~2 MOA


Note that that last result was made using 5-rounds groups (it did about 3 MOA on the 20 rounds group and I decided to try 6 x 5-rounds groups). This is the result for it:

9dZBl69.jpg


Now, before you rush to buy crates of that RWS ammo... it was $15 for a box of 50, so $0.30 a round. Good to try once, but not so good for practice unless you're competing. Those rounds were so well lubricated that they wanted to squirm out of my fingers when I was loading them. :p

The Federal American Eagles and CCI Mini Mag cost about $0.10/round, the Federal Game-Shok $0.14/round and the Winchester Wildcat was under $0.07/round.

So as for anything else, you get what you pay for. I don't think I'll buy any more Wildcat. :rey2


Some more notes:

1. I sighted my scope using the Game-Shok ammunition. Then I discovered that the Winchester Wildcat and American Eagle rounds were consistently shooting about 1.5" higher than my POA, the CCI Mini Mag about 2" higher but the RWS Special Match about 1" lower. All that at 50 yards, with not much wind. Afterward, I shot a second control group with the Federal Game-Shok to validate this observation and yep... right on target with 19 rounds in 3 MOA with no vertical deviation (and one flyer 2" high).

2. At one point, some poltergeist made the rifle slip from the sand bags while my back was turned. The rifle actually landed on its butt and stood upright against the bench, all by itself. Good boy! However, this caused the cheap scope to completely lose it's zero, I had to move it back 5.5 MOA leftward to re-sight it. I may have to splurge for a better quality sight, sigh.

3. Another weird thing: about half way into the shooting session, I was feeling the rifle's action start to grind... getting less and less smooth. That was at about 300-350 rounds total shot from that rifle. Then I noticed a few flecks of metal dust on the lever close to its pivot (where it would have collected anything falling off the internal action). That I didn't like... So I squirted some WD40 into the action and the whole thing became smooth as glass again. Weee!

4. Last observation: the Henry Frontier is plenty accurate enough for a lever action plinker! It may not be an Anschutz, but now that I've proven that it can do <2 MOA from a stable rest using match ammo, I can really start working on my shooting technique (first without rear bag, then without front bag, then sitting, kneeling, standing, jumping, upside down and finally eyes closed while doing backflips).


Damn that addiction...

:ninja:
 
Last edited:
I am glad you got good results with your Henry Frontier! I have a nearly identical rig to yours but in 22 mag and with 4x Tasco (for shame) residing on it. I too have been super happy with mine, very smooth action and never any hiccups. Henry makes a great gun. I am debating on whether to upgrade the scope or order a Skinner peep for it. Choices choices! Owning this one in 22 mag really makes me want to get a friend for it in .22 lr... or 17 hmr or both!
 
Yeah... that heavy barrel really tames the recoil...

But aside from that, the Frontier is an excellent rifle.
 
Coolhand, if the .22WMR wasn't about as costly to shoot as my 9mm carbine, I might just have picked that caliber too. But since I got the bug and started shooting 200-300 rounds per weekend... I needed the cheapest caliber I could get my paws on. Reference the sights... I'd have liked using the iron sights, but with my eyes either I use the glasses to see far and the sights are blurry, or I use my close-in glasses and then the target is blurry... so I had to use a scope. I didn't really want to put a $300 scope on a $500 rifle so I put a cheap rimfire one. But if I need to, to have a scope that keeps its zero... I'll do it. I can always move it later to my next gun. :)

Hoyt... it's a light recoil compared to other non-semiauto .22LRs, something that was remarked upon by other shooters I let try the Henry on the range. It's still a .22LR of course, not a rimfire .600 Nitro Express. :p
 
Last edited:
I really like the balance that the heavier octagonal barrel gives on the Frontier models. It does weigh 6.25 lb so it definitely has an adult gun feel to it. I picked the 22 mag to be a 'trainer' for my Win 94 30-30 before the recent price increase in 22 mag ammo. I just saw an ad for 19.99/ 50 !! I can handload my 30-30 for not much more. so a cheap practice time gun hasn't really materialized for the Henry. But I really like the gun and want to keep it so I will repurpose it for my ~100 yard coyote/bobcat etc gun. Even though the on paper accuracy is only good but not spectacular (2" @100 yards) with the heavier barrel I feel I can shoot this gun really well, it is becoming one of my favorites in my gun safe.
 
Just to add a comment about sights. I did find the factory sights to be actually decent. What many times frustrates me is not so much the sight picture but the coarse and clumsy adjustments. I was having trouble with the ladder getting the elevation to where I wanted for my load cci 40gr maxi mags. One setting on the ladder was too low, the next 8" to high. After I put the scope on to try it I discovered the little sight leaf can be moved to fine tune it. Oh well, I think the scope does help to take advantage of the 22 mags extra range so I'm leaving it on for now.
 
Nice shooting! Silverfoxdj: I'm curious what loader you use...

It just so happens that I was also out shooting my 22lr Frontier today! Good little shooter and tons of fun. This is purely an iron sight plinker for me so I haven't done any formal accuracy tests but it was easily holding "minute of soup can" at 15 - 20 yards. I was also able to pick off crab apples fairly consistently as well.

I was switching between Winchester Dynapoint Target HP and CCI Quiets and the point of aim seemed pretty much the same at this range. The Quiets are tons of fun in this gun and I've got a brick ready to take with me to the cottage in a few weeks (probably will pick up another brick just to be on the safe side).

I agree that the stock sights are workable although the weak point is the rear sight. I flipped around the little sight insert so I don't have that annoyingly off-center white diamond jumping out at me. Seems to work better although the black finish is a little shiny and can throw a glare when the sun is overhead. I will likely replace the rear (and maybe front) sight eventually. Any suggestions here? A peep sight would be nice - maybe a Skinner or a DIY sight (I work in a machine shop and could probably whip something up).

Also, anyone know what kind of metal the receiver cover is made of? I know it's some kind of "alloy" but what kind? I may want to get it refinished in the future and I have access to a metal finishing shop but it would be important to know what material it is.
 
Nice shooting! Silverfoxdj: I'm curious what loader you use...

Loader? LOADER? No one told me I could use a loader! Can she be brunette, 5'-3", 105lbs, C-cup with a compliant disposition and a pretty skimpy work uniform? :xes


In truth, I did consider getting a Spee-D-Loader (https://www.henryrifles.com/product/spee-d-loader/), but I realized it's not actually much of a time saver for me: I have to first load the loader after all, and it's another piece of kit to lug around. I can think of situations where it's useful (e.g. competition), but none applied to me.

I'm finding that the easiest way to load the Henry for me is just to hold it upright with my fingers blocking the "normal" loading port on the magazine tube, remove the spring tube entirely and just grab the rounds 2-3 at a time from the nearest convenient surface (I found my hat worked nicely as a bulk ammo holder) and slide them in butt first. Count to 15, the nose of the last round should be visible in the loading port, re-insert the spring tube and fire away!


About the receiver cover, my Google-Fu yielded this:

(RimfireCentral.com from a 2014 post) Andy Wickstrom, General Manager of the Wisconsin Henry factory, submitted this information on this forum in 2012 regarding the Zamak 5 alloy they use for the receiver covers and barrel bands: 'First, the metallurgical standard for this metal is Zamak 5. Inside of the Zamak 5 spec we maintain even tighter control of certain elements to further improve physical properties. Second, the metal is cast using the ultimate in high pressure die casting equipment. The power and speed of this process is impressive. The process used to control the quality of the product consists of countless variables that are finely tuned to produce the very best physical and cosmetic properties.'"​

(Wikpedia): Zamak (formerly trademarked as ZAMAK and also known as Zamac) is a family of alloys with a base metal of zinc and alloying elements of aluminium, magnesium, and copper.​

Looks like it's about 95% zinc, 4% Aluminum, 1% Copper and traces of Magnesium. No Unobtainium or Kryptonite, damnit. I tested the cover with a magnet, and while there's ferrous metals under it the cover itself isn't magnetic, so I assume the information from RimrireCentral is accurate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom