SPUHR mounts

[Brian46]

Question for you guys - I looked hard at the SPUHR mono mounts, but looked away when I saw they couldn't come anywhere near as low as just rings. I've got ATRS low rings waiting for my ATACR. Am I wrong??

-J.

they have different height mounts, or is their lowest height still too tall?

 

[johnl]

This hobby is emptying my bank account faster than smoking crack... lol...

Once the novelty wears off, it's even worse

 

[Gunneegoogoo]

they have different height mounts, or is their lowest height still too tall?

If I remember right, the lowest SPUHR is about 1.2", whereas ATRS etc get to .8".

-J.

 

[Brian46]

If I remember right, the lowest SPUHR is about 1.2", whereas ATRS etc get to .8".

-J.

ATRS 30mm low is .888 spuhr rings are as low as 1", but even the 1.2" on the one piece is usually too low to not have barrel interference with a large objective scope on most rifles.

What are you putting this on because it sounds like the rail is quite a bit higher than the action for you to be able to use such low mounts.

 

[Gunneegoogoo]

It'll be going on a Savage 110FCP .338, and it'll be an 56mm objective, on a Farrell 20MOA rail. It's a 34mm tube. These worked on my buddy's BA, so I'm assuming it'll work on my FCP.....

-J.

 

[bsand]

ah man I was going to put in a order for the unimount but they don't make one for 25mm!!

 

[Kevin M.]

So did you get your mount yet OP?

My personal opinion is to get as much MOA as possible added when building the long range guns. I had a 20mOA base on my 338, but still ran just shy on elevation to get to a mile. Next build will have at least 40 Moa between the base and the rail.