My uncle served in Northern Europe in '44 and '45 he told me once that the "medal" thing was a crock in some cases. He claimed that some of the bravest individuals he had ever seen received no bravery decorations while commisioned officers seemed to have them pinned on with regularity with no special performance. Perhaps he had an enlisted man's bias.
he was absolutely right!! But I think it may have been a little unfair to malign ALL Officers (to be sure - General Officers received an inordinate number of gongs!!) but read this about the Awards granted to the Dieppe participants: (here's the Link PDF ... and recommended reading.. scholars.wlu.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=cmh )
an excerpt:
"The most remarkable views were those of Lieutenant-Colonel Douglas E. Catto (The Royal Regiment of Canada) who suggested in a letter
dated June 30th, 1943, that recommending awards for specific individuals would result either in an inordinate number of recommendations
being made or unfair discrimination as between those finally honoured and those not decorated. Having canvassed his fellow POW officers, Catto
recommended that all surviving members of the regiment be entitled to wear a special badge or patch denoting their presence on the raid. Catto
repeated this suggestion even more forcefully after being liberated."
Catto was in the POW camp when he received correspondence from Canadian Army and was asked to provide his recommendations for awards for bravery after the raid...when the Army wouldnt go along with Catto's very strong recommendation that there must be an award for EVERYONE who landed based on his observation of the bravery of all Canadian troops .. Catto refused the DSO they wanted to give him!!
It is also very
NOTEWORTHY that the only two awards given posthumously for operations were the
Victoria Cross (VC) and the
Mention in Dispatches (MiD) - at Dieppe the VC was only "available" if you were KIA (and specifically restricted in number regardless of the bravery involved!)... next time you see a posthumous MiD ...READ the citation VERY carefully ... you may well be reading about a guy that should have got a VC -- but got the "consolation" prize. The MiD is a simple Oak Leaf
(there is the incident of a Sergeant with The Royal Regiment of Canada at Dieppe who observed one of the landing craft trying to get off the beach with wounded men but was under heavy MG fire from an emplacement - the Sgt. gathered up as many hand grenades as he could and walked out onto the beach and - in open view - he threw them at the emplacement to suppress the fire in order to permit the LCI to push off... he was successful for a while until he was eventually killed by MG fire from a supporting German emplacement further down the beach. AFAIK - he received no gallantry award! .. I think these were the acts that motivated Catto's behaviour)