Hey folks.
Hypothetically speaking, why not use a .22 handgun for 'social' work? It's controllable, so accuracy is enhanced (and bullet placement is all-important); it is cheap to feed (and to purchase) and thus to practice, practice, practice with; it is certainly lethal at close range (does not .22LR claim most of the deaths-by-firearms each year?); and its lightweight to tote around.
I suspect the answer to this question will be some form of 'energy, sectional density, velocity, and it doesn't start with a four, you sissy', but I was thinking how practical this is...
If it's such a good idea, though, why don't we do it this way?
thanks in advance for any replies.
Hypothetically speaking, why not use a .22 handgun for 'social' work? It's controllable, so accuracy is enhanced (and bullet placement is all-important); it is cheap to feed (and to purchase) and thus to practice, practice, practice with; it is certainly lethal at close range (does not .22LR claim most of the deaths-by-firearms each year?); and its lightweight to tote around.
I suspect the answer to this question will be some form of 'energy, sectional density, velocity, and it doesn't start with a four, you sissy', but I was thinking how practical this is...
If it's such a good idea, though, why don't we do it this way?
thanks in advance for any replies.


















































