Ok milsurp guys need some help"pic heavy"

[pc9]

First off I no nothing about milsurp rifles. These are going to a gun show and would like to know some value before I ask to little or to high.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks

 

[pc9]

More

 

[pc9]

Another

 

[pc9]

One more

 

[scotiangunlover]

the no1mk3* wouldn't be worth a whole lot because it has been sporterized and is missing pieces.

 

[woodchopper]

My opinion top to bottom

$500
$175
$150
$200

If the barrels are in good shape

 

[pc9]

My opinion top to bottom

$500
$175
$150
$200

If the barrels are in good shape

Exellent thank you

 

[Ganderite]

I agree with those prices. If I was selling them, I would be firm with those prices because they are fair.

 

[gaff]

there retail prices , not what dealers will pay at a gun show. you will be doing good to get $500. for the lot. from a dealer.

 

[pc9]

there retail prices , not what dealers will pay at a gun show. you will be doing good to get $500. for the lot. from a dealer.

I will have a table myself so will be selling to the public. If they don't move then maybe to another dealer.

 

[RRCo.]

If the Ross has the original 30.5 inch barrel and a really nice bore, maybe as much as $400. You didn't show the marks over the chamber, but if there is no hammered in WWII UK serial number or "E" or "N" or "LC" then you have the early tight dimension chamber which means much longer case life if reloading. Otherwise as above.

 

[pc9]

If the Ross has the original 30.5 inch barrel and a really nice bore, maybe as much as $400. You didn't show the marks over the chamber, but if there is no hammered in WWII UK serial number or "E" or "N" or "LC" then you have the early tight dimension chamber which means much longer case life if reloading. Otherwise as above.

Ok thanks
I will have to check again

 

[bearhunter]

I think the $500 on that No4 is high. Might be worth that without the Parker Hale stamp on the receiver but that ruins it for me. If I had it on my table, $400 would take it away.

 

[louthepou]

The No4 likely is a de-sporterized; as bearhunter mentions, the "Parker Hale" is the clue.

For me, the most important aspect is: how are the bores? Mint will commend twice as much money as worn, or more!

 

[pc9]

Time to get out that bore light.
So look for strong rifling no rust anything else?

 

[B_noser]

I doubt the Ross would bring $400.00 even if the bbl is the full 30.5". The charger guides have been removed and the correct rear sight is missing. I would think $300.00 tops.

 

[Philthy1]

Its been years since I've seen any full military configured Enfield for less than 600 at a gun show.

You can always tell a vendor. They say something is worth 300$ then put it on the table for 8

 

[pc9]

So got out the bore sight and checked them over. Other than being filthy they all have strong rifling.
Thanks everyone for your input.

 

[flying pig]

I doubt the Ross would bring $400.00 even if the bbl is the full 30.5". The charger guides have been removed and the correct rear sight is missing. I would think $300.00 tops.

If the barrel is full length that's the biggest value. The rear bridge is there. That sight could *possibly* be a legitimate variation. There was a simplified sight like that used. Rear sights can be had. If the barrel is in really good shape that one would not scare me away at $350, considering having the stock spliced and a handguard made is going to cost about another that much, plus at least $60 for a sight, and $175-200 for a reproduction nosecap, another $50 for a reproduction front sight hood etc. Could be a nice shooter when complete though!

Stock is sanded though, trigger guard is proud again. Is the butt plate there or does it have a pad or something installed?

 

[pc9]

Couple more pics of the Ross.
It does have the 30.5 barel