Did you get a lemon or are they all like that?
I think it all comes down to "expectation".
I sell, so I handle a lot of Axis, 783, Patriot's and Americans. The group of them is very popular with first time hunters or guys that are finally retiring their Grandfather's old 303.
I point out the quality or lack there of. I point out the sharp edges, the marks in the metal work, the poor blueing, the sloppy bolts, the cheap hollow stocks and in the case of the Axis, the trigger that takes two men and a boy pulling on it to get it to fire. Like seriously, for about 150 more bucks you can get a Model 11 which is a pretty fair "starter rifle".
But "they" don't care. They have an almost non-existent budget for this "tool" that they will use once a year and if the rifle comes with factory glass then all the better. They are going to spend a week with the boys mostly drinking beer and smoking cigars "out in the woods" and if they wake up early enough they are going to sit a stand for deer - at least if it isn't too cold or wet out. Then the rifle is going back in rear of the closet with the mfg supplied trigger lock and will remain forgotten until next year unless they are "busy", then it will be the year after that.
For "them" this "gun" allows them to get away for a week and "do some hunting with the boys". They could care less about fit/finish, quality of the stock, resale value etc - they want something that will go bang and hit what they aim at (with the cheapest box of shells they could find).
That is the "typical" guy who buys one of these and it's over 80% of the type of guys buying any gun where I work. For every X-Bolt or Mod 70 that goes out the door, 4 Axis go through the register. That's what "typical guys" buy so while I might order a couple of model 16 Savages in my order there will a couple of dozen Axis on that same order sheet - that's just the reality.
The majority guys/gals that frequent this forum "love guns" - they like to look at them, fondle them, take them apart, play with them and shoot them a lot. They want a nicely finished, quality product. The consider "value for the money" over "price" so they see the "value" in a Vanguard II or a T3 even through they could have bought 2 or 3 "budget rifles" for the same price. But I would suggest that "that type of owner" is NOT typical - most guys just don't care - at least not the one opening their wallets on a daily basis right now...
Did you get a lemon or are they all like that?
Since I had all the other popular "budget" guns in the stable (Axis/783/Howa1500/Vanguard) I bit the bullet and got one of these Americans before the new pricing kicked in. I've never been so disappointed in a new rifle in my life. I'm actually surprised these things sell at all, let alone how popular they are...
So what do I hate....the stock is equivalent to the ####ty Axis stock material in quality. Flimsy garbage.
Every round or curved surface has tool marks from turning too fast with a dull tool, inside and outside of the rifle. The barrel exterior and receiver rounds look like it has fine screw threading everywhere it's that bad and that obvious. When working the bolt it sounds like a ####ing zipper because of these tool marks inside the receiver. Brutal.
Mag is loose as hell and flops around in the rifle. Also full of over-flash on all the molding edges.
Bolt shroud is plastic....margarine container plastic.
And the best part, the bolt face came scored/pitted from either the proofing loads or test firing rounds having loose primer pockets. Nice ring of pits on a brand new bolt face....#### you Ruger!! Lol
I won't even sell this thing on CGN...I don't want anyone to buy it without a good look over. It will be going to the consignment shop and I'll be taking a bath on it....maybe start at $300 and go down from there lol.
Piece of ####
My RAR Compact in 243 is one of the most accurate rifles I own. As far as quality, it is what it is and I am fine with it.
I bought a Kimber in February and so far am not impressed with the rifle at all, should have bought another RAR instead.
Or maybe 4 or 5 RAR's. The Kimber needs trigger work, the magazine box is binding in the action, the bolt is no smother than the RAR and accuracy is nothing to brag about. The Kimber sure is a nice looking rifle though, and I am sure the deer will appreciate it more when I use it for hunting if I get the nerve to take it into the bush risking getting it all scraped up.
David
So how does it shoot?
From the original post it sounds like it looks like a budget gun (which it is). But how does it shoot?
My Savage Axis in .223 Rem looks like sh*t but shoots very accurately.
You buy cheap, you get cheap.
economical = low price
cheap = junk.
Lots of people don't know the difference.
And a lot of people these days aren't prepared to work on something to make it good...or they're hopeless when it comes to working with their hands.![]()
Because some American companies already make a decent quality rifle with an acceptable finish for $400? If Remington and Savage can do it, why can't Ruger?It's 2016. A Bic Mac meal at McDonald's costs $10, a dozen eggs $3.50, a good steak $15, a tank of gas $100, a new truck $45,000+.
Why people expect to get a quality new firearm for $400 is beyond me.




























