Hey guys,
Sorry for the long post, but I want to give the most complete picture I can.
After years of recreational target shooting & hunting, I recently joined CGN & discovered the 50 yard challenge.
I'm pretty much a newb when it comes to actual target shooting, don't belong to any clubs & if I could hit the can at 50 & 100 on a Saturday afternoon in the field I was doing great.
I've had a Ruger 77/22vbz in .22LR for about 15 years & its always been 'accurate enough' for me. I haven't changed any components of the rifle. I recently switched to a Vortex Crossfire 2 4-12x40 from a Bushnell (Banner?) 4-12x40AO & added a bipod for stability.
Once I discovered the challenge I thought I'd give it a go & did some reading on the forum to see where I could make the most improvement. Of course I thought it would be easy LOL.
I ordered a range of quality ammo from Hirsch (SK Match, Lapua Center-X & what the heck, some Midas+ for comparison) to supplement the Remington Target & CCI stuff that I usually shoot.
I got my shooting spot & got set up at 50 & started shooting only to find I wasn't really coming close with any of the groups (all 5 shots, 5 -10 group averages):
Average - High - Low
CCI Subsonic HP - 1.145" All groups the same. Weird.
Remington Target - 1.121" - 1.669" - 0.878"
SK Match - 0.964" - 1.359" - 0.574
Lapua Center-X - 0.888 - 1.249" - 0.474"
Lapua Midas+ - 1.067 - 1.389" - 0.743"
I can post targets later if that helps.
Three issues immediately came to mind:
1. The rifle has a very heavy trigger pull.
2. The scope cross hairs almost entirely cover the bull.
3. The scope was at it's maximum elevation & I was still shooting 1" to 1-1/2" low.
I was wondering where I should focus my attention on these issues. I'd like to keep the rifle, it has sentimental value (1st gun I ever bought) & I prefer to improve my equipment rather than passing it along. I am open to trigger work, or changing out the scope, but it all of course depends on budget.
What do you folks think I should do first?
Thanks
Ryan
Sorry for the long post, but I want to give the most complete picture I can.
After years of recreational target shooting & hunting, I recently joined CGN & discovered the 50 yard challenge.
I'm pretty much a newb when it comes to actual target shooting, don't belong to any clubs & if I could hit the can at 50 & 100 on a Saturday afternoon in the field I was doing great.
I've had a Ruger 77/22vbz in .22LR for about 15 years & its always been 'accurate enough' for me. I haven't changed any components of the rifle. I recently switched to a Vortex Crossfire 2 4-12x40 from a Bushnell (Banner?) 4-12x40AO & added a bipod for stability.

Once I discovered the challenge I thought I'd give it a go & did some reading on the forum to see where I could make the most improvement. Of course I thought it would be easy LOL.
I ordered a range of quality ammo from Hirsch (SK Match, Lapua Center-X & what the heck, some Midas+ for comparison) to supplement the Remington Target & CCI stuff that I usually shoot.
I got my shooting spot & got set up at 50 & started shooting only to find I wasn't really coming close with any of the groups (all 5 shots, 5 -10 group averages):
Average - High - Low
CCI Subsonic HP - 1.145" All groups the same. Weird.
Remington Target - 1.121" - 1.669" - 0.878"
SK Match - 0.964" - 1.359" - 0.574
Lapua Center-X - 0.888 - 1.249" - 0.474"
Lapua Midas+ - 1.067 - 1.389" - 0.743"
I can post targets later if that helps.
Three issues immediately came to mind:
1. The rifle has a very heavy trigger pull.
2. The scope cross hairs almost entirely cover the bull.
3. The scope was at it's maximum elevation & I was still shooting 1" to 1-1/2" low.
I was wondering where I should focus my attention on these issues. I'd like to keep the rifle, it has sentimental value (1st gun I ever bought) & I prefer to improve my equipment rather than passing it along. I am open to trigger work, or changing out the scope, but it all of course depends on budget.
What do you folks think I should do first?
Thanks
Ryan