Any updates on Troy Sporting Rifle (PAR)

fenceline said:
308 version doesn't have an frt yet. Different receiver than the 223 version.
Click to expand...

In your opinion, would a new FRT for the 308 version probably take a long time? Or could it possibly be deemed a "variant" of the standard PAR and be in country quickly?

Also, does anyone know if North Sylva submitted a copy of the 308 version to the lab at, or around the same time as the 5.56 version was submitted?

I want one of these but the 308 version interest me more.
 
I can't decide on which one I should try to buy - the 223 version or wait for the 308. Believe it or not I'd load cast in 308 for volume, fast type shooting so the difference in cost between the two calibers would be about the same. The 223 is a cool folder, while the 308 has the versatility for hunting.

Decisions, decisions.
 
Dorian Gray said:
In your opinion, would a new FRT for the 308 version probably take a long time? Or could it possibly be deemed a "variant" of the standard PAR and be in country quickly?

Also, does anyone know if North Sylva submitted a copy of the 308 version to the lab at, or around the same time as the 5.56 version was submitted?

I want one of these but the 308 version interest me more.
Click to expand...

No longer than the time between the modern hunter and the modern varmiter frt's being published. Same idea.
 
Don't require a 308 version as a simple 223 barrel change to a .277 Wolverine, 30 HAR + bolt, 6.8 SPC + bolt, 300 ACC, 7.62 x 39 + bolt + Mag and a number of others will make it a good deer rifle.
 
So the lower is already classified as Non restricted, takes AR mags, triggers and stocks.... can someone design a semi-auto upper similar to the AR platform? that would be a sweet option, and wont need to wait in line for 5 years for a classification.
 
polskadude said:
So the lower is already classified as Non restricted, takes AR mags, triggers and stocks.... can someone design a semi-auto upper similar to the AR platform? that would be a sweet option, and wont need to wait in line for 5 years for a classification.
Click to expand...

Then they will just reclass it as a semi auto and screw everyone over.

If they can say guns are easily convertible to auto, they can say guns are easily convertible to semi auto as well.
 
greentips said:
Then they will just reclass it as a semi auto and screw everyone over.

If they can say guns are easily convertible to auto, they can say guns are easily convertible to semi auto as well.
Click to expand...

Easily means nothing really, what does it matter? The act is illegal no matter how easy or difficult, millions of people could easily make a full auto gun from scratch comma dot Period!
RCMP are nothing but a arm of the liberal policy makers, right or wrong. They stand for nothing but themselves!pathetic!
 
greentips said:
Then they will just reclass it as a semi auto and screw everyone over.

If they can say guns are easily convertible to auto, they can say guns are easily convertible to semi auto as well.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't be a change to the receiver. The receiver is classified as the regulated part. If you put an upper on it that fired in semi auto, it would be restricted or non-restricted based on barrel length.

The RCMP only determine if a gun is prohibited by name, restricted by name (or a variant of either), full auto, or converted auto.

If there aren't those, it is what it is.

Converting a PAR to semi auto by just swapping a custom upper onto it wouldn't change the regulated portion of the gun, and wouldn't give the RCMP anything to mess with, short of whether the gun is restricted or non-restricted and requiring registration as such.

Having a gun "easily converted to semi auto" isn't a thing legally. They have already determined the lower can't be easily changed to full auto. Adding a semi auto upper by adding some sort of gas system wouldn't result in any change of the lower design.

You could make an AR15 into a single shot upper by removing the gas system, and it wouldn't be a change in the lower.
 
Rebel Rouser said:
Why don't you guys give credit where credit is due. Gadget spend all the time and money sending in samples to get the FRT. He did all the foot work to make it happen. He has the distribution rights for Canada for Troy.
Click to expand...

The credit for the submission belongs to North Sylva rightfully for the PAR, time & money was all North Sylva while I acted in the support role & liason between NS & TROY !!!

gadget
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom