I butcher my own game.
I'm pretty sure a magnum velocity .338 bullet is going to result in more bloodshot meat than a 7x57.
The brisket can be used for more than grind as can the leg.
If meat damage doesn't exist unless you shoot a deer in the ass why is the .338 not a popular deer round?
I do my own game as well. Regardless what you shoot it with there'll be bloodshot meat. My go to is a 338 wm and I've never noticed anymore or less meat loss then my other rifles. This is a lie lol. Ive had two elk get away from me in my elk hunting career. This was using a 30-06. So I guess my 338 has less wasted meat. I have not lost a animal since I've acquired my 338.
The 338 is not a popular deer round because many places where deer are hunted there is no elk.
My thoughts as well....... The 338 is not needed on deer but would be a great elk round IMOP.......
Personally, I would rather be equipped with a rifle suitable for the biggest game I am hunting and use it on the smaller game I am hunting and pick my shot, rather than try a do all...... But that's just me..... And I rarely hunt multiple species with the exception of bear and whitetail overlap, where a .308 or 7-08 is a great do all....
For your environment your chambering choices are right. Deer and bears are not nearly as tough as elk. Imo elk have got to be the tastiest but the toughest critter ive encountered. Unless you like shooting and tracking I'd go with a bigger gun that I shoot well then a smaller gun that I shoot well.
There is absolutely no need to carry a 300 or 338 of any flavour for Elk. This comes from first had killing big bulls experience. Any 30-06 based cartridge will kill an Elk handily and if they are getting away after being hit, they were poorly hit in the first place. Shoot a reliable rifle with a reliable scope and reliable ammunition and you will pot your Elk. Period.
I don't disagree...... I just like to use big cartridges and place my shots.....
We are all different.....
Both of mine were taken with a loaner brown precision in .270........
Norwestalta what bullet do you use for elk and deer?
I have a lot of elk worthy bullets in the 250-300 grain range and a lot of deer worthy bullets in 200. Let me guess from the theme of this thread go with the big bullets. I was packing 300 woodleighs for black bear to see how they would work but didn't get one. Saw lots of deer and elk though; hence the thread.
Chuck curious what your opinion is on the 7x57? 270 seems to be coming up a lot and they seem pretty similar with an edge to the .270.
Bulls or cows?
Norwestalta what bullet do you use for elk and deer?
I have a lot of elk worthy bullets in the 250-300 grain range and a lot of deer worthy bullets in 200. Let me guess from the theme of this thread go with the big bullets. I was packing 300 woodleighs for black bear to see how they would work but didn't get one. Saw lots of deer and elk though; hence the thread.
Chuck curious what your opinion is on the 7x57? 270 seems to be coming up a lot and they seem pretty similar with an edge to the .270.
There is absolutely no need to carry a 300 or 338 of any flavour for Elk. This comes from first had killing big bulls experience. Any 30-06 based cartridge will kill an Elk handily and if they are getting away after being hit, they were poorly hit in the first place. Shoot a reliable rifle with a reliable scope and reliable ammunition and you will pot your Elk. Period.
I'm sorry, but blaming the 30-06 on your lost elk is a bit much.
Love my 7mm rem mag.
My rifle does not like the 185 grain bullets.
I am also always curious if the 185-210 bullets are intended for the .338-06 and 338 federal and may expand too violently on elk.




























