The FRT - Firearms Awaiting Classification - Updated 18-DEC-2017 Faxon XRS-C

Are my eyes playing tricks on me? Airsoft guns need to be formally assessed?

They are firearms under section 2 of the criminal code. Some shoot overy 500 fps and thus become firearms regulated by the firearms act. There is at least one list on the frt that is prohibited as it shoots full auto and over 500fps.

Most are firearms, but exempt from certain sections of the criminal code as per section 84(3) cc
 
i Just got back an FOI for converted autos 2 weeks ago. They have a M14A1 that has been waiting since Dec 2010 for examination. There are 11 that have been there longer than my CZ which they received in Oct of 2013.
 
It boggles my mind that it should take so long to do classification. Ideally there should be a fairly simple checklist:

- Is there anything that would make it prohibited? If no, then is it a handgun? If no, the barrel length equal or greater than 470 mm in length and is the overall length equal or greater than 660 mm? If yes to both then it is non-restricted. Case closed.
 
The document is an administration manual as to how a firearm is entered into the FRT.

It is not a collection of technical guidelines on how a firearm is evaluated ( as converted or variant) and given a classification, based on a defined technical framework.

The FOI inquiry should not only ask for " step by step" process", it should also ask for any technical manuals and written guidelines specifically pointing to the evaluation and determine of variant and converted auto.

A step by step process is like asking for...say you run a warehouse, you write a manual on the inventory system to tell the warehouse guys to press "A" for "hygiene" products and "B" for "family planning", then press "enter". But the manual is not the place to go on and on about how to tell the difference between "hygiene" and "family planning" products. Either it is so obvious or there is another book of guidelines, outside of the inventory system manual.

I also did not see the RCMP completely answered all inquires , as to why it takes more than 2 years to look at each entry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It boggles my mind that it should take so long to do classification. Ideally there should be a fairly simple checklist:

- Is there anything that would make it prohibited? If no, then is it a handgun? If no, the barrel length equal or greater than 470 mm in length and is the overall length equal or greater than 660 mm? If yes to both then it is non-restricted. Case closed.

Read the whole pdf. They spell out everything that is done.
 
It's restricted by barrel length. North Sylva is the importer. If tnw makes one with a longer barrel then those would be nr. IRG will likely bring some to market I would think. If they find some.

Don't think many are being widely produced now.

Non restricted ppsh were advertised on this website by one retailer or another. The TNW M37 is also long out of production but we recently saw a bunch on the market
 
Just a reminder to everyone if you want a FOI request from the RCMP or any Federal department they can only charge you the $5 application fee. The rest is now free thanks to JT. So ask away
 
Non restricted ppsh were advertised on this website by one retailer or another. The TNW M37 is also long out of production but we recently saw a bunch on the market

Not for sale they weren't. The concept was advertised as a future sale plan wrt the ppsh. Tnw has not yet advertised ppsh41 sa with longer barrels, so currently the only ones made available are restricted based on their barrel lengths.
 
Back
Top Bottom