Spark II for $260 shipped fits the bill.
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...63-Vortex-Venom-amp-SPARC-II?highlight=vortex
Can the Bushnell TRS-25 handle the m14 jackhammer?
I've personally killed 3 vortex scopes on M-14 rifles....
I'm not terribly sure it will hold up, but with the warranty it's defiantly worth the effort to try.
Exactly, nothing to lose.
Have you tried a sparc?
Not on an M-14.... The one I used to have died on an AR in .223.....
I actually "rate" the Bushy TRS-25 a little higher than the Vortex IMHO....
All told I have sent 5 different vortex's back for warranty.... For the price, I'm pretty disappointed. 3 scopes, a strike fire and a Sparc.
They do have fantastic glass, but when you loose the recticle it doesn't really seem to matter.....
I just received a brand spanking new replacement Viper PST 6-24 FFP EBR-2. Great scope, awesome glass. Repeatable turrets.... A+ specs.....
But it didn't last 30 rounds.....
M-14s are hard on scopes!
A used Comp M2 or M3 could be around 400$ I guess. In a low ring you may not need the cheek riser. An Eotech or another AR sight would likely bring your heigth over bore to 3-4", not very desirable.
Off topic but why do you need so much top rail?
If it was my rifle and I wanted to use a reddot, I'd get a Ultimak or M14.ca SHG. It would allow to keep the great iron sights and cowitness with a low Aimpoint or micro reddot. And you'd save the weight of the extra rail and cheek riser.
Is it possible to co-witness M1A sights with a red dot using a micro type and the M14.ca hand guard ?
Been entertaining that idea but want to confirm before proceeding. Wasn't sure if even this setup would be a touch too high to pull it off.
My TRS 25 on a m14.ca SHG is a lower 1/3 co-witness with the irons.
It works very well IMHO.
My TRS 25 on a m14.ca SHG is a lower 1/3 co-witness with the irons.
It works very well IMHO.




























