Ruger hawkeye mkii opinions
- Thread starter WhelanLad
- Start date
Moose Masher
CGN Regular
- Location
- Oak Hammok Manitoba
I really like the Ruger 77 MK II design. I have owned several.
My experience has been that as time goes on, Ruger does less and less to smooth out the sharp edges left from any machining.
Some of the examples I have owned or handled in the past few years have had some seriously sharp edges.
My experience has been that as time goes on, Ruger does less and less to smooth out the sharp edges left from any machining.
Some of the examples I have owned or handled in the past few years have had some seriously sharp edges.
The MKII is not a Hawkeye and the Hawkeye is not a MKII... they are guns of different eras with different design subtlties. The LC-6 trigger was introduce with the Hawkeye model, but I personally prefer the MKII "lawyerized" trigger after I have worked on it... for the most part, I dislike the Hawkeye matte finishes in both stainless and blued... but the "satin" blued finish is nice... I prefer the MKII "bright" stainless and deep blue finishes... I also believe fit and finish is better (in general) on the MKII guns.
What do you mean by "lighten the beast" are you referring to the trigger pull or the physical weight? Trigger jobs are simply done... as for the physical weight, M77's are robust builds (I like that), so weight reduction will primarily come from the stock, barrel contour and barrel length... if weight is an issue start with the Ultralight (RL) model as the 20" pencil barrel and smaller contoured stock save about 20 ounces out of the box over the Standard model (R).
I own M77's in many calibers and most versions, including the Stadard (R), Ultralight (RL), Iron sighted (RS), International (RSI), Express RS, Safari Magnum (RSM) all of my rifles are MKII's with the exception of an M77 RS 20" Carbine .358 Win which was never made in the MKII series... if it had been, I would jump on it.
What do you mean by "lighten the beast" are you referring to the trigger pull or the physical weight? Trigger jobs are simply done... as for the physical weight, M77's are robust builds (I like that), so weight reduction will primarily come from the stock, barrel contour and barrel length... if weight is an issue start with the Ultralight (RL) model as the 20" pencil barrel and smaller contoured stock save about 20 ounces out of the box over the Standard model (R).
I own M77's in many calibers and most versions, including the Stadard (R), Ultralight (RL), Iron sighted (RS), International (RSI), Express RS, Safari Magnum (RSM) all of my rifles are MKII's with the exception of an M77 RS 20" Carbine .358 Win which was never made in the MKII series... if it had been, I would jump on it.
Last edited:
Trimmer 905
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Yes sir! I,too,have an RSI,an Ultralight RL and Hawkeye all weather SS. Unbelievable tack drivers,the best I've ever owned.
Pretty good summary..... The M77 action is a beefy one, so pretty hard to make a truly light rifle out of it.......
I am pretty sure the MKII frontier was made in .358...... Either that or I spent a lot of time searching for a unicorn..... Lol
freezer filler
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Windsor, Ontario
You are right, it was made in 358... I remember because while I was trying to decide between that and 338 federal, they stopped making both!
nowarningshot
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I have a few MkII and one of the TS and hawkeye. They are all keepers, none are ultralights.
My Hawkeye is a blued 300wm and fits me like it was a custom. It has a nice blue, but the fit sold me regardless.
Lots of rifles have come and gone, very few M77 leave.
My Hawkeye is a blued 300wm and fits me like it was a custom. It has a nice blue, but the fit sold me regardless.
Lots of rifles have come and gone, very few M77 leave.
I've owned a M77-MarkII that had the LC-6 trigger from factory. It was a stainless compact in 223.
- Location
- Yellowknife, NWT
Had a Hawkeye in .257 Roberts. Good, solid, accurate rifles. The action feels like a bank vault locking up. Solid as ten rocks.
I found the trigger okay at best; I had planned to swap it out but then sold the rifle in a fit of madness.
I found the trigger okay at best; I had planned to swap it out but then sold the rifle in a fit of madness.
In the changeover period many MKII's had LC-6 triggers factory installed and also many of the Lipsey's special runs are denoted "MKII" and have the LC-6 triggers also... but that was not the norm for the 15 years of full production MKII's.
You're just getting spoiled by that Kimber. Take the Ruger up a few hills before your muscles atrophy.
I've had a couple of tang safety Rugers, but only one MKII... generally unimpressed. Big gaps in the inletting (rain gutters), and the action was so rough I never did manage to polish it enough to stop it from binding. I would start to think I was making progress, then compared it to one of my Mausers. I finally gave up and let it be someone else's problem.
Mine either...... I do find that the bolts are usually not smooth out of the box though, but after one shot they turn smooth as silk..... Not sure if that is a product of investment casting or not......
