Xbolt vs T3 in 30-06, Pros/Cons?

Have a 30-06 Xbolt SS and a T3 CTR 260 Rem and T3 223 Hunter. Same pro/cons as already mentioned so leave the dead horse alone. All are easy MOA, none are consistent 5 shots half MOA (as expected of a hunting rifle).

Had to buy again, 30 caliber and higher XBolt for heavier gun. 150gn is comfortable, 180 kicks a fuss.
Below 30 cal get the Tikka T3. Shot friend's T3 in 300WM, ouch...
 
The Tikka will be more accurate and it will be lighter. When you are young that may not be an issue. The older you get the more of an issue it becomes. The Tikka will also be a little cheaper price wise. Take the money you save on the rifle and put that into a little better scope. You will never be sorry.
 
Tikka being Lighter and more accurate , I don't think so . There's a reason why a Xbolt costs a bit more. Fit and finish are much better on the Xbolt, better trigger also. And for those who say the bolt is not as good , I didn't have that problem, I found my Xbolt slick as snot. I had both in 7 mm and if I were to buy another it would be the Xbolt.
I know the Tikka is popular because of the aftermarket support. XBolt don't need it.Im talking strictly hunting applications not target shooting. Tikka may have been good , but now they're not much better than a rem or savage. :)
 
I smell a troll, or somebody really insecure.
Why would I be insecure? I'm just telling it like it is . I had both , pic were on here showing my guns. Xbolt was cloverleafing at 100 yards . Tikka was 1 1/4 at best. This was out of the box. Anybody knows if you take both side by side and compare that the xbolt has a bit better fit and finish and the trigger is a bit better. So what's left ? If for hunting purposes either will do, if for target , get the Tikka as it has tons of aftermarket support. But if your being honest you know the browning is just a bit better.!As for trolling , I'm not quite sure what that means, but yes I am kidding around a bit . Not trying to get anybody to upset:)
 
Tikka being Lighter and more accurate , I don't think so . There's a reason why a Xbolt costs a bit more. Fit and finish are much better on the Xbolt, better trigger also. And for those who say the bolt is not as good , I didn't have that problem, I found my Xbolt slick as snot. I had both in 7 mm and if I were to buy another it would be the Xbolt.
I know the Tikka is popular because of the aftermarket support. XBolt don't need it.Im talking strictly hunting applications not target shooting. Tikka may have been good , but now they're not much better than a rem or savage. :)

Yeah, there's a reason the x-bolt is more expensive: more complicated design.

I've got 2 X-bolts and 4 Tikkas. I loke them both, but the fit and finish on all four Tikkas is superior to either of the X-bolts, and one of those is a white gold medallion. Rough castings is the order of the day on X-bolts. If it's not visible from the gunrack, it doesnt get finished or polished on an X-bolt.
 
tikka t3 lite are listed at 6.2-6.4 pounds. browning x bolt ss stalker is listed at 6.5- 6.75. the new t3x are a bit heavier than the t3. I know in my hands my x bolt feels lighter. let me go weigh them for you......
 
At the end of the day , both will be great hunting rifles. I found the browning to be the better rifle, for me.OP will only ever know what's better for him, when he try's both. Sorry if I offended anyone.
 
tikka t3 lite ss in 223 with b and c stock, burris full field 2 scope in leupold bases and burris rings- 7.9 pounds.
tikka t3 lite blued in 243 with leupold bases and burris fings and an elite 3200 3-9x40-7.75 pounds.
browning x bolt stainless stalker with browning one piece rings, and a burris fullfield 2 3-9x40 scope-7.6 pounds.

that's what I figured my x bolt is lighter. the way there set up anyway and that's not changing.
 
I also like the safety much better on the browning, as well as the button to open the bolt with the safety on. I like them both, and I don't know why tikka fans are the way they are but they remind me a lot of ford and john deere fans. they wouldn't even consider anything else and they don't know why. I own guns from all makes. I have owned ford and gm trucks. I drove them both to over 200 thousand km. I kept all repair bills. the ford cost over 5 times as much to drive to 200 thousand km. im in the marked for a new truck and will buy one of the 2. have looked at both, have friends with both in new trucks and there all nice when new. it will come down to my preference, warranty and price. but I give both an equal chance. I find that all my ford buddies wouldn't even consider another brand, yet they all have issues and there all the common well known issues in those year trucks, and all brands have them some just a lot more than others. but all the gm guys are not so loyal. this is the same thing I find with tikka fans. they think they found the holy grail of rifles, when in truth most shoot well but some do not. just like most other manufactures. and when you sit down and look, every manufacturing shortcut ever devised for bolt action rifles is on the tikka. one length actions and mags, bolt stops not caliber family dependent(think 223, 204), checkering in 3 short blotches cause its easier to hold a straight line that way than one long patch. now don't get me wrong tikkas r still nicely done unlike most other rifles with those same shortcuts, but I think they should be priced less than they are. they have climbed a lot more through the years than other brands, and if u ask me its cause they became popular some suit behind a desk jacked up the price.
 
Tikka's are the only modern rifle with ALL manufacturing shortcuts (and don't fool yourself into thinking that there's a modern rifle without significant manufacturing shortcuts) that actually comes together in a brilliant package. Tikkas are inherently simple in design, have among the best barrels, receivers (for DM) and factory triggers on the market, have the smoothest bolts on the market, and the smoothest feeding magazines on the market. The negative 'PR' on use of glass reinforced polymer (not to be confused with recycled margarine containers lol) is really over blown and growing tired. Most manufacturers use polymer. Tikka mags are virtually indestructible, and while the trigger guard is polymer, it is very strong. Except for the shroud, there isn't anything that begs replacing. At the end of the day, there's beauty in simplicity, especially when it's sub-MOA. Yes, there's a growing aftermarket, and I enjoy putting a few "frills" on my rifles, like bigger bolt knobs, etc., and while the T3 is brilliantly modular in design, the "frills" I like to add-on aren't my main attraction to the rifle. My latest T3, a Battue with a nice oiled walnut stock has particularly nice finishing. I certainly hope that anybody that reads this thread looks over the BS, handles and hopefully shoots and cleans both rifles before making a decision. I would also like to restate that you're not going fool Tikka shooters into believing that X-bolts are "way more accurate", nor are you going to fool most people into thinking the finishing is "way better" on a Browning. It just isn't true.
 
Tikka's are the only modern rifle with ALL manufacturing shortcuts (and don't fool yourself into thinking that there's a modern rifle without significant manufacturing shortcuts) that actually comes together in a brilliant package. Tikkas are inherently simple in design, have the best barrels, receivers (for DM) and factory triggers on the market, have the smoothest bolts on the market, and the smoothest feeding magazines on the market. The negative 'PR' on use of glass reinforced polymer (not to be confused with recycled margarine containers lol) is really over blown and growing tired. Most manufacturers use polymer. Tikka mags are virtually indestructible, and while the trigger guard is polymer, it is very strong. Except the the shroud, there isn't anything that begs replacing. At the end of the day, there's beauty in simplicity, especially when it's sub-MOA. Yes, there's a growing aftermarket, and I enjoy putting a few "frills" on my rifles, like bigger bolt knobs, etc., and while the T3 is brilliantly modular in design, the "frills" I like to add-on aren't my main attraction to the rifle. My latest T3, a Battue with a nice oiled walnut stock has particularly nice finishing. I certainly hope that anybody that reads this thread looks over the BS, handles and hopefully shoots and cleans both rifles before making a decision. I would also like to restate that you're not going fool Tikka shooters into believing that X-bolts are "way more accurate", nor are you going to fool most people into thinking the finishing is "way better" on a Browning. It just isn't true.

Great post
 
Tikka's are the only modern rifle with ALL manufacturing shortcuts (and don't fool yourself into thinking that there's a modern rifle without significant manufacturing shortcuts) that actually comes together in a brilliant package. Tikkas are inherently simple in design, have among the best barrels, receivers (for DM) and factory triggers on the market, have the smoothest bolts on the market, and the smoothest feeding magazines on the market. The negative 'PR' on use of glass reinforced polymer (not to be confused with recycled margarine containers lol) is really over blown and growing tired. Most manufacturers use polymer. Tikka mags are virtually indestructible, and while the trigger guard is polymer, it is very strong. Except for the shroud, there isn't anything that begs replacing. At the end of the day, there's beauty in simplicity, especially when it's sub-MOA. Yes, there's a growing aftermarket, and I enjoy putting a few "frills" on my rifles, like bigger bolt knobs, etc., and while the T3 is brilliantly modular in design, the "frills" I like to add-on aren't my main attraction to the rifle. My latest T3, a Battue with a nice oiled walnut stock has particularly nice finishing. I certainly hope that anybody that reads this thread looks over the BS, handles and hopefully shoots and cleans both rifles before making a decision. I would also like to restate that you're not going fool Tikka shooters into believing that X-bolts are "way more accurate", nor are you going to fool most people into thinking the finishing is "way better" on a Browning. It just isn't true.
Well you're right , after all 4 others have decided the same... :)
 
Ok , why did Tikka just change their design? If they were so great, why make 2 major design changes?

Sooooo... You know they've changed the X-bolt design, right?

Tikka added a metal bolt shroud, made a cosmetic change to the ejection port, switched from aluminum to steel for the recoil lug, and made an inconsequential change to the stock. None affect performance. It's still a T3. They're just trying to shut up people who criticize inconsequential design choices.

A first gen Glock is a Glock. So is a second gen. And a third gen, and a fourth gen. A first gen glock is still a superbly designed handgun.
 
I also like the safety much better on the browning, as well as the button to open the bolt with the safety on. I like them both, and I don't know why tikka fans are the way they are but they remind me a lot of ford and john deere fans. they wouldn't even consider anything else and they don't know why.

Stopped reading right there. I can already tell you've got nothing but personal aspersions to contribute.
 
Sooooo... You know they've changed the X-bolt design, right?

Tikka added a metal bolt shroud, made a cosmetic change to the ejection port, switched from aluminum to steel for the recoil lug, and made an inconsequential change to the stock. None affect performance. It's still a T3. They're just trying to shut up people who criticize inconsequential design choices.

A first gen Glock is a Glock. So is a second gen. And a third gen, and a fourth gen. A first gen glock is still a superbly designed handgun.
No , I didn't know that. I've read something about the Hells Canyon but thought that's just a new model.
 
Stopped reading right there. I can already tell you've got nothing but personal aspersions to contribute.

ha ha good one. I own and shoot and like both brownings and tikkas. I have owned both ford and gm products. I grew up farming but don't anymore. there is a green tractor on the yard right now, its very nice. but it was not the only option considered. my point is I personally know and have seen online many tikka fans that belittle most other guns simply cause there not a tikka. I have half a dozen friends that wouldn't buy nothing but, and actually have never owned another brand centerfire. plenty of other fine rifles out there. and wouldn't you know it they all drive fords and if u listened to them u would think they are designed and assembled right inside the pearly gates of heaven. they also all don't put 40 rounds through there tikkas a year.
 
Back
Top Bottom