LSS-22 Chassis for Rimfire Bolt Action Rifles

All I got is my 64 MSR that would fit this list. Hmm, and I *really* love the original stock on there.

And my Sako Quad Range is my TRG trainer ... so not that either.

Looks like I might need a Savage 22 ... hmmm.

I guess I'll put my Ruger LSS chassis on EE, since it really isn't function on my Frontier and get one for the 10TR instead. Then a Savage 22 trainer paired to that.

Glad I picked up another cabinet :)
 
On the left is a base plate for the Mark II, and on the right for the 93R17, about the most popular .17HMR that is used and owned, and that is the only part on stocks that doesn't fit both, just saying.


 
In the details on your site it says the chassis stock has been dropped to accommodate iron sights. I have read negative things about the grip height in relation to the trigger. Is it the same as the lss chassis or has it been dropped lower? It looks like the 64/54 models might have higher stock heights because of no open sights.. maybe some picture could be posted comparing the lss lss-22 stocks.
 
In the details on your site it says the chassis stock has been dropped to accommodate iron sights. I have read negative things about the grip height in relation to the trigger. Is it the same as the lss chassis or has it been dropped lower? It looks like the 64/54 models might have higher stock heights because of no open sights.. maybe some picture could be posted comparing the lss lss-22 stocks.

That is with the LSS-XL and the HS2 to allow for fixed stocks. You will not have that issue with the LSS or LSS-22
 
I confirm !

1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_091252_cut_800.jpg


My first idea was an old 1607, but real "match 54" with bulky 5071 or 5018 trigger didn't fit.

So I tried with my 1712.
1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_094123_cut_1024.jpg

A bit different from the look and fill of the factory stock (which is for me one of the best factory stock).

The fit is perfect, I appreciate the easily reachable button magazine.
A modified PRS is an adequate buttstock, comfortable and adjustable.

1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_094212_cut_1024.jpg


Time to shoot. The scope is a Leupold FXIII 25x40, my usual bipod with Podpaws.
1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_102335_cut_1024.jpg


1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_102312_cut_1024.jpg


110Yards, bipod front, rear weak hand, SK rifle match.
1) 1 shot, 2clics up, 3 right and 4 shots.
2,3,4,5) 5 shots groups
then a 20 shots group.
1722_LSS-22_cible3-4-100m_8pano_00.jpg

2" groups.
I've already done better with the factory stock, but today 0°C (32F) was a little cold for me and the ammo.
 
Last edited:
I confirm !

1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_091252_cut_800.jpg


My first idea was an old 1607, but real "match 54" with bulky 5071 or 5018 trigger didn't fit.

So I tried with my 1712.
1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_094123_cut_1024.jpg

A bit different from the look and fill of the factory stock (which is for me one of the best factory stock).

The fit is perfect, I appreciate the easily reachable button magazine.
A modified PRS is an adequate buttstock, comfortable and adjustable.

1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_094212_cut_1024.jpg


Time to shoot. The scope is a Leupold FXIII 25x40, my usual bipod with Podpaws.
1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_102335_cut_1024.jpg


1722_LSS-22_stand100m_20161127_102312_cut_1024.jpg


110Yards, bipod front, rear weak hand, SK rifle match.
1) 1 shot, 2clics up, 3 right and 4 shots.
2,3,4,5) 5 shots groups
then a 20 shots group.
1722_LSS-22_cible3-4-100m_8pano_00.jpg

2" groups.
I've already done better with the factory stock, but today 0°C (32F) was a little cold for me and the ammo.

Thanks for you pictures. The only rifle in my 22 cabinet that matches the LSS-22 is my Annie 64 and I am not sure I want that one moved to this chassis, as I love the 64's MP-R stock.

Hope to hear more on your experience with accuracy, comfort, etc...
 
64 MPR is a good rifle, the stock isn't as good as the 1712, except when a thumbhole for 1416 is adapted (barrel channel need to be enlarge).

I've an old 1395 (1416 ancestor) that may received an LSS-22 for 64, I'll probably try-it with the MPR just to see ...

My first impression, despite the excellent factory stock, is that the pistol grip give a better feeling/control on the trigger. It's easier to have a good positive let off.

The factory 1712 is awesome, my first day at the range, 110 yards, new out of box.
Anschutz%201712_stand%20100m_20131215_164500_cut_1024.jpg

cibles_1712_100m_3-6_20131215_163458_cut_1024.jpg

The 4 ring is 50mm, about 2".

With the LSS, I'll hope maybe a little more accuracy (if possible) from rigidity and action/stock fit. But more than that a better comfort for repeatable results, given by pistol grip and adjustable buttstock. Weight seem well balanced with the PRS, I'm waiting for a collapsible tube to try an STR or CTR and eventually a foldable adapter.

Today, results were good, no more. I havn't shot for two months and the main drawback was the temperature , too cold for me and the ammo (next time I'll keep them warm).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom