Here are some of my friends bullet tests with water jugs
These bullets are left to right 139gr SST @ 1,850fps; 139gr Interbond @ 1,826fps; 139gr Interlock@ 1,910fps; 140gr Accubond @ 1,930fps
![]()
Up till now, I used 1800 fps as the cut-off point for my rifles, that is, once the velocity drops to 1800 fps or thereabouts, that would be the maximum effective range for that cartridge. Judging by that test, I'm going to have to revise that up a few hundred fps. Shooting at longer ranges, where there is more chance for error in bullet placement, together with a bullet that barely expands, would be a bad combination. The Accubond didn't do too badly though.
Here are some of my friends bullet tests with water jugs
![]()
These bullets are left to right 139gr SST @ 1,850fps; 139gr Interbond @ 1,826fps; 139gr Interlock@ 1,910fps; 140gr Accubond @ 1,930fps
![]()
I was googling some numbers. 2000fps for hornady interlock/interbond, and the old tsx. 1800 fps for partition, ballistic tip, accubond, and the newer tipped tsx.
To my surprise, the accubond long range claims no maximum velocity, and a minimum of 1300fps. Obviously that's crazy low compared to other options, so maybe that's the ticket the OP is looking for?
WL Going to heavier bullets in a 7mm08 certainly compromises the powder capacity of the 7mm08 in a short action rifle. In my opinion you want to find a "middle weight" bullet that will give you the best compromise. I have found that the Barnes TTSX 140 gr bullet will out penetrate many 160 and 175 gr cup and core type bullets. The Nosler 140 gr E-Tip bullet is very similar. The very best bullet for heavy game in the little 7-08 case may well be the 150 gr Nosler Partition. Short enough not to compromise case capacity yet heavy enough to penetrate on heavier game. Also the fragile nose of the partition is pretty much guaranteed to open up at lower velocities. Hope that helps.
5.Cup and core ballistic tip style (SST , Ballistic Tip) excellent ballistics, far too rapid of expansion at close range/high velocity.
still HTH did it exit?
if so, doesn't really mean it didn't expand violently...
WL
im paying $38 for 50 woodleighs
the woodleighs recommended impact Velocitys are -2000-3000fps, im wondering how they would go in a test of lower velocities)
One of the site sponsors sells Woodleighs at 140gr and I'm going to give them a go next year. The top stickly thread regarding .264 Bullet Test Results shows impressive results for them. The price is about the same as AB's. I never considered them before Whelan, believing supply being the critical factor.
Willbar, thank you very much for sharing those bullet results. Tremendous information.
Kelly I'm following your reasoning and experience. The Swift bonded bullets also look impressive albeit a little heavier.
Regards
Ron
Yeah 10-4 on that mateSoft animals get soft bullets. Hard animals get hard bullets.
Yup exited. I know it expanded very violently. Exactly what I was looking for. Buddy shot a deer same distance with a 7mm rem mag and 140gr winchester grey box. We had to track that thing 50-100 yards through the bush. The hole on both sides of the deer was 7mm in diameter.
Soft animals get soft bullets. Hard animals get hard bullets.
What type of wound channel would you say it created? You best kind of guestimate?
Hey fellas, im about through what has been a great box of Woodleigh projectiles loaded up for my deear kimberly.
I can obtain the Woodleighs for a suprising $38.10 delivered to my Door and so ill be using the Brand again , however i have choices..
Being a fan of the -If it aint broke dont fix it club,
What are some Pros and Cons if i go to a 160gr or even a 175??gr Weldcore.
Primarily used for the Big Deer of The South ( Sambar deer) (300kg) heavy boned , Elk sized, thick skinned. XP3 class.
Lol.
With the exception of two 300m shots, most have been within 15m to 250m
I use a 2-7 x 33
Cheers
WL



























