I did speak with Harley a few days ago on this matter. I will address the points of his comment at this time. The big issue here as far as I can tell is case separation, of which has absolutely nothing to do with the barrel threads being .015 under max diameter. When this particular rifle was built we were running 7/8 diameter barrel threads. When we made the move to bring magnums into the 52 caliber lineup, we increased them to 1 inch. From what Harley told me, he was getting .860 as opposed to .875, which is .015 under max diameter, which is .0075 shorter per side, which in the big picture is nothing on tapered threads, and certainly nothing that would have absolutely anything to do with case separation, headspace, hard bolt uplift, accuracy, etc. As for the barrel that came on the rifle, I would have had no issue with using the same barrel to rechamber (if it even needed it), as the threads were not out of spec whatsoever. As for the action being light bodied and light duty, the 52 action is incredibly strong. We run calibers ranging from 6.5x284, through 416 Rem Mag. It's strong- we checked.
Don't you just hate it when you post what somebody supposedly told you, then that person posts so that everyone knows what they actually told you?
