Nightforce NSX versus Leupold Mark 4

Well then Cal should qualify lol:

long-range-rifle-scope-reviews.jpg


His testing and review of scopes was second to none. And not just scopes muzzle breaks and other components as well.

In addition to the stuff he tests the summary of what equipment the PRS winners in the top 100, top 50, and top 10 is also very interesting.[/



This guy did a lot of tests and has independent findings , these threads ??
 
Yeah, until you get buyers remorse and end up spending more on different scopes than if you just bought the one you wanted in the beginning.

More like you ask for a Mark 4 and find out that ship has sailed.

Perhaps I should have said "buyers of new scopes" instead of "new scope buyers".
 
Last edited:
Well then Cal should qualify lol:

long-range-rifle-scope-reviews.jpg


His testing and review of scopes was second to none. And not just scopes muzzle breaks and other components as well.

In addition to the stuff he tests the summary of what equipment the PRS winners in the top 100, top 50, and top 10 is also very interesting.[/



This guy did a lot of tests and has independent findings , these threads ??

If you're looking for his reviews they are at precisionrifleblog.com. It's a completely not for profit, very professional website.
 
Go to the world F class championships in Ottawa next Aug and you will see that Nightforce will be used bye 80% to 90% + of the shooters.from all over the world
 
tactical-scope-reviews-ratings1.png


Here are the final results of his scope testing. The testing was very in depth and goes on for dozens of pages. Click adjustment calibration, resolution, features, and almost every other aspect were extensively tested under almost laboratory conditions (he's an engineer.) It took weeks to do.

I know I have mentioned this a lot but it is a really impressive collection of data.
 
Back
Top Bottom