I was at a local sportsman show a couple of weeks ago, and I thought I'd quiz a guy at the ccfr (can.center for firearms rights) booth to see if they might have had any inside information. I was really disappointed with his answer; he said that nea doesn't have a chance of getting non restricted status because IT IS a AR15 variant. I'm aware of the argument that the ar10 predates the ar15, which makes sense to me. It just put me off that a guy representing a gun rights group would have such a anti view about it.
another fail by the ccfr
I renewed my family membership in early december 2016 never got our membership cards, emailed them 4 times to be told 4 times they were mailed, no biggie, dont care really, i see it as 200$ bucks to support a gun org, they can keep the cards. But now a comment like that, shows the ignorance...



















































