Quick MV review: the good, the bad, and the Ugly! **update post 99**

rally guy

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
35   0   0
So a couple of weeks ago I received my new ATRS MV and I just thursday took it to its first range trip w8th a loner scope. I am going to keep this very short.
20170222_220200.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]

So first;

THE GOOD:
-rifle was ready in 4 months instead of the average of six advertise.
-finish, quality, look feel all were splendid.
-the folks at Atrs were very pleasant and accommodating true the whole process.
-the rifle ran flawlessly EVERY SINGLE ROUND OUT OF EVERY SINGLE MAGS I HAD!
(That included 5 round of the dreaded norc ammo, over 100 round of winchester white box and 20 round of Remington UMC; from 3 atrs pistol mags, 1 pmag and one usgi mag)
- beside my flyer witch was shot number 5 of 5 the rifle seem capable of sub moa a curacy with CHEAP bulk Rem umc 55 gr. Fmj ammo. That from a bellow average shooter that hasn't ben to the range in almost 6 months.
-weighs less then 7 pound naked

THE BAD.
- this rifle makes alot of my other gun look bad.
-It came before the eta so it killed my wallet lol

THE UGLY! !!
-NOTHING!


20170331_145629.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 
Last edited:
What configuration do you have? I can't ID the parts by looking at them.

Atrs MV.
- light contour mate stainless lija barrel
- fortis switch 14 inch 223 hangard ( I have a second brand new one for sale)
-mft minimalist stock
-magpul asap sling mount
-hogue grip
-a2 birdcage (temporary)
-leupold vx-r 4-12×40 on an Aero precision mount(temporary)
-Cadwell bipod on a mft qd bipod mount ( use on multiple guns.
 
Good to hear a positive review on these, I was thinking of selling some other guns to get one but I've seen some poor reviews on here about the mh that made me leary to lay out that kind of cash for one.
 
Well dang.. tho I guess I already knew it was amazing and was planning on getting one; new MH is gonna need company. Thanks for adding some fuel to the fire!

I will now return to rubbing two pennies together ;p
 
Nice review, thanks. If you have the time, I would love to see a follow-up with various factory and may be hand loads.
 
does your toilet paper roll over or under? does it really matter?
It mattered to me,with this particular mount,as I'm right handed. If you align the reticle perfectly in the center, it rotates to the left ,when you torque it down.
So you have to put your reticle a bit to the right and torque it.
Kinda trial and error, it helps if your looking through the scope ,while tourquing it down.
Much easier to do , if your screw are on the right side.
So yes it matters ,if your a righty :)
 
does your toilet paper roll over or under? does it really matter?

It doesn't. But.
I add up:
- the position of the scope in relation to the stock and assume an average eye relief of such a scope, plus
- the ammo used, plus
- comments on below average shooter, rusty shooter, rickety bench, plus
- remaining comments

And, come to the conclusion this post and thread is worth as much as what I paid for it....

20170222_220200.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]

- the rifle seem capable of sub moa a curacy with CHEAP bulk Rem umc 55 gr. Fmj ammo. That from a bellow average shooter that hasn't ben to the range in almost 6 months.

THE BAD.
- this rifle makes alot of my other gun look bad.


THE UGLY! !!
-NOTHING!


20170331_145629.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 
Back
Top Bottom