And so the grand reveal is .....Ardent?
I've decided to recenter my battery around Remington 700s and the odd Savage.
You can hunt wood bison in BC and Alberta as well, BC has a legal minimum of 2000ft-lbs of retained energy at 100 yards and 175gr or higher bullet weight. Tough on .270s but the rest manage.
Boomer has a good point it would have to be light, as much of the 29 is mountain game with backpacks and boots.
I'm going to be super boring here and say 7 rem mag. Some might say it's not enough gun for the real big stuff, but I've seen several large bison go down with one shot. A few got back up, but they were the exception, not the rule. If I had to pick a rifle platform, I would go with the Ruger no1 just to keep it classy.
Ever run any 7RM factory ammo over a chrony? It's not the gun a lot of people think.
Many, and she's bloody fast at 110/120gr, and kicks the crud out of my 7x57 at 175grs. Not sure what folks think it is, I think it's a .270 (also a fantastic cartridge) on juice that can sling equally light bullets, better, or heavier, significantly better. And it's on every dusty home hardware shelf. What's it supposed to be?![]()
It's a 30-06 that burns a lot more powder and kicks more to do the same thing.
My 8x57 can equal the heavy factory 7RM loads I chrono'ed.
You actually bring up an interesting point many miss, another uncomfortable truth in hunting rifles for instance is the .308 shoots flatter at all hunting ranges (out to 400) than the 7mm-08 when you match bullet weights. It's more efficient, the greater expansion ratio is more important than the 7's better BC. .30-06 / 7 Mag sees this too without sharing a case. But I digress...
You are off on a couple important points though in my eyes. The 7mm Rem Mag often loads the same powder weights as the .30-06, for instance most conventional powders (non-retumbo etc) load about 60grs in each with a 150gr bullet. If you compress in a bunch of retumbo, the 7 Mag opens a lead on the -06, but this isn't factory as you referred to in fairness. The 7 Mag kicks exactly like a .30-06, and anyone who tries to tell you one's a shove one's a punch hasn't owned and loaded for both side by side for any appreciably period of time. They're identical in recoil, powder burn's so close it's negligible too, but the 7 Mag handles the light spectrum to be a better .270 for sheep, mountain goat, and antelope nicer. If you believe in SD it's better off than the -06 until the -06 goes over 200grs and gets slow, too. I'm not so much a believer in that anymore.
.30-06 is great with zero faults as a NA29 rifle, and so is 7 Mag. I just like the 7 Mag's tool box & sleeve tricks better for mountain work.
Sounds like your infatuation with the 270 was short lived and the 7RM is the new flame.![]()
You actually bring up an interesting point many miss, another uncomfortable truth in hunting rifles for instance is the .308 shoots flatter at all hunting ranges (out to 400) than the 7mm-08 when you match bullet weights. It's more efficient, the greater expansion ratio is more important than the 7's better BC. .30-06 / 7 Mag sees this too without sharing a case. But I digress...
You are off on a couple important points though in my eyes. The 7mm Rem Mag often loads the same powder weights as the .30-06, for instance most conventional powders (non-retumbo etc) load about 60grs in each with a 150gr bullet. If you compress in a bunch of retumbo, the 7 Mag opens a lead on the -06, but this isn't factory as you referred to in fairness. The 7 Mag kicks exactly like a .30-06, and anyone who tries to tell you one's a shove one's a punch hasn't owned and loaded for both side by side for any appreciably period of time. They're identical in recoil, powder burn's so close it's negligible too, but the 7 Mag handles the light spectrum to be a better .270 for sheep, mountain goat, and antelope nicer. If you believe in SD it's better off than the -06 until the -06 goes over 200grs and gets slow, too. I'm not so much a believer in that anymore.
.30-06 is great with zero faults as a NA29 rifle, and so is 7 Mag. I just like the 7 Mag's tool box & sleeve tricks better for mountain work.
I agree that they are both excellent choices.
What happens when you dump the same charge of the same powder with the same bullet weight into the 7RM and 30-06?
At the top end the 7RM burns about 10 grains more powder to accomplish the same thing. That's 15% or more powder, that energy is going somewhere, ie: into your shoulder. My shoulder tells me the 7RM kicks more.
It is a bit of a hobby of mine seeing what is on store shelves, the selection of 7RM ammo is always smaller and pricier than 30-06.
I think we all know the answer to the original question is 300 Mag if you can take the recoil, 30-06 if you can't.






























