Bushnell 4200 vs 3500 or even 4500

[Spcamno]

Currently own a few 4200 and would like to know how's the 3500 or even 4500 compares to it?

I know the eye relief on my 4200 is not generous compares many out there but they are very clear to my eyes and for some reason I like them.

Any input will be very much appreciated.

 

[IvoB]

I have the 4500 still new in box - have no time to mount and shoot yet - will post review once I do

 

[kamlooky]

Them 4200 undritts are junk.
Oww many yew gartzs and oww muchie$$?

 

[Spcamno]

I have the 4500 still new in box - have no time to mount and shoot yet - will post review once I do

Thanks for you post please do so when you get a chance to mount and share your finding.

Really don't understand why people post crap to build up post counts.

 

[*MALICE*]

I received a 8-32X40 4500 side parallax under warranty when the elevation on 8-32x40 4200 adjustable objective stopped working (walked into Bushnell.....15 minutes later walked out with new scope).

Aside from the parallax adjustment (I prefer the side adjust to AO) and the fact that it's shorter because of that.....personally, I can't notice any difference in clarity or function.

I would assume a 3500 would be in a lesser category than the 4200 (3200 'turned into' 3500 and 4200 'turned into' 4500)......?

 

[jjohnwm]

Wasn't the 3200 a 3-to-1 zoom range and the 4200 a 4-to-1? Same relationship for 3500/4500?

 

[Spcamno]

Wasn't the 3200 a 3-to-1 zoom range and the 4200 a 4-to-1? Same relationship for 3500/4500?

I have four 4200, 3 in 2.5-10x40 and 1 in 3-9x40 so guess they makes both but I realized 3-9x40 not offer in the 4500 line now.

 

[IvoB]

Thanks for you post please do so when you get a chance to mount and share your finding.

Really don't understand why people post crap to build up post counts.

I will

 

[Spcamno]

I will

Thank you!