Shooting .357" in 9mm cases - range report.

Grawfr

BANNED
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
BANNED
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Sol III
Hello all,

A couple months ago I inquired about the feasibility of shooting .357" bullets in 9mm cases, because I had hundred of those bullets on hand and my Henry Big Boy Steel apparently does not like at all to shoot anything other than 158gr (every lighter bullet I've tried made the groups open up). After gathering the answers from the community here and from other sources I thought I should share back some results.

In brief: it works quite well! :d

I've been shooting them from a Beretta Cx4 that has a tad over 5000 rounds through the barrel and a slightly lightened OEM trigger (it's at about 5 pounds pull by guesstimate). I get no indication of overpressure (or at least nothing different from all of the other 9mm semi-hot loads I've tried to date). The brass comes out quite dirty as usual (from the straight blowback design of the Cx4), with very light cratering of the primers on about half the spent brass.

Load data: Brass: IMI previously fired 2-3 times / Primer: WSPM / Powder: 5.9gr of Hodgdon CFE Pistol (about max charge) / Bullet: Hornady .357" 110gr XTP
load 1729 is lightly crimped on the bullet's canelure, giving them an OAL of 1.054"±0.003",
load 1733 is lightly crimped almost as long as I could reasonably make it for that short 110gr bullet, OAL is 1.140"±0.003".

Results: All my results are taken from series of 10-round groups at 100m, shot from a front rest and rear sand bag, in two batches shot on different days. I measured the groups with all the impacts, then the best nine holes and again the best eight holes only.

Load 1729 (5.9gr, 1.054" OAL, 12 groups): 10/10rds 4.0 MOA; 9/10rds 3.2 MOA; 8/10rds 2.7 MOA
Load 1733 (5.9gr, 1.140" OAL, 7 groups): 10/10rds 3.8 MOA; 9/10rds 2.9 MOA; 8/10rds 2.6 MOA


I tend to regard the "9 of 10" results as likely the most representative of my "normal" shooting, since those groups are pretty regular in shape (no undue stretch in any direction, so I either have every possible shooting problem at the same time or none of them in any great amount at least). ;)

For yardstick, those results are slightly better than what I've gotten with quality 9mm (.355") bullets from Hornady (124gr XTP), or cheaper Winchester 124gr FMJ and Campro 115gr FCP-RN. And a lot better than what I've gotten from Sierra 90gr JHP or Bullet Barn 124gr LRN cast bullets.

Since the store had some in stock and I'd never tried that brand, I bought a box of Sig Sauer 9mm 115gr FMJ... oh boy, what a waste that was. I shot 2x5, 2x10 and 1x20 groups. Every single group was about 6 inches wide, and the 20-rounds group was perfectly centered on the bullseye... except it covered 9" high x 6" wide in area!

Right after the Sig Sauer rounds, I shot some reloads I had made with CamPro 115gr FCP-RN bullets to validate it's not me or the rifle, and did much tighter groups. Weird stuff.

And now that I think of it, I also have some left over CamPro .38 cal 125gr FCP-TC that the Henry doesn't like... hmm...... :evil:
 
A bunch of us shoot CZ 75's and resize our cast bullets to .357. It's not an issue at all for 9mm cases. 2 years ago I used to use a DRG 130 which was actually a 38 bullet at .358 in my CZ
 
Campro 125 grain .357" bullets might not be optimal, but they will work for 9mm.

For lead bullets, I would be inclined to use .357" as the preferred diameter for 9mm, provided that there are no issues with loaded rounds fitting the chamber. It is not unusual for many 9mms to have larger than .355" groove diameters, which can lead to heavy leading or even keyholing with common .355" or .356" sized bullets intended for 9mm. Of course, if the standard sizing works for you, then carry on.
 
I only shoot plated/ jacketed bullets. Think I'll stick to .355's.

I'm sure with the larger dia bullet more pressure will result? Shorter barrel life? Or does .002 thousands even matter? I'm sure with lead it doesn't other than increased fouling.
 
I was talking to a chap at our range who was doing it the exact opposite way, 124 gr 9mm in a 38 Special case in a S&W revolver. Seemed to work very well shooting at 25 meters from a rest.
 
I only shoot plated/ jacketed bullets. Think I'll stick to .355's.

I'm sure with the larger dia bullet more pressure will result? Shorter barrel life? Or does .002 thousands even matter? I'm with lead it doesn't other than increased fouling.

Don't be too sure. The .001-.002" oversize cast bullet will usually cause less fouling than a smaller diameter cast bullet. It's one of those things that seems counter-intuitive until you understand why.
 
Last edited:
Have you tried 147's? Looks like you have only been shooting light bullets.

I've tried some commercial 147gr with very unimpressive results. I still have to try reloading with that bullet weight, it's on the program! :)

Campro 125 grain .357" bullets might not be optimal, but they will work for 9mm.

For lead bullets, I would be inclined to use .357" as the preferred diameter for 9mm, provided that there are no issues with loaded rounds fitting the chamber. It is not unusual for many 9mms to have larger than .355" groove diameters, which can lead to heavy leading or even keyholing with common .355" or .356" sized bullets intended for 9mm. Of course, if the standard sizing works for you, then carry on.

I did try 9mm 124gr lead round nose, seized to .357" from Bullet Barn, and was very disappointed... like 20 to 30 MOA for the entire range of powder charges (min to max), with quite a bit of leading in the barrel. Now that I think of it, I do have those 158gr lead SWC seized at .358"... perhaps I should try them too, if I can figure a reasonable and safe powder charge. I wish I had a soft lead bit to slug my barrel, I really am starting to suspect it's made a tad oversize for a 9mm.
 
I have shot thousands of campro .357 125s through my 9mms. I got a great deal on them and figured why not. I use 4.2g of Titegroup for 1100fps out of a 4.5" bbl.
 
Back
Top Bottom