*UPDATE- RELEASED !!!* NEW .22 from DLASK ARMS CORP.

I'm still kicking around the idea of one of your 10/22 target rifles. Will these be offered in that configuration?
 
As I have a .22lr rifle already, I don't need another one. However, I think I will still get one or two magazines just to say "*uck you" to the RCMP.
 
No. It is a TUF-22.

It shares a platform with Ruger 10/22 rifles but it has design changes to enhance reliability. It has only ever been produced as a rifle and will only ever be produced as a rifle. The magazines designed for it are proprietary and will NOT fit into any other 10/22 platform firearm.

Devils Advocate. What if a person purchased a DAR, and had it converted into a pistol and registered as such. Would the magazines then by definition become ''illegal?'' (please not if anyone does this I am sure Joe will hang them up by their kishkes.)
 
Devils Advocate. What if a person purchased a DAR, and had it converted into a pistol and registered as such. Would the magazines then by definition become ''illegal?'' (please not if anyone does this I am sure Joe will hang them up by their kishkes.)

Doesn't matter. According to the rcmp, if a competitor came up with a tuf22-charger pistol that uses the tuf22 mags, then the mags will hav been retroactively designed for pistols, therefore prohibited. If the tuf22 fits into a charger stock, all that's needed is to cut the barrel and submit the monstrosity for an FRT, and there you go, back to square 1.
 
Devils Advocate. What if a person purchased a DAR, and had it converted into a pistol and registered as such. Would the magazines then by definition become ''illegal?'' (please not if anyone does this I am sure Joe will hang them up by their kishkes.)

It would not become a pistol, it would be a restricted rifle.
Pistols are originally designed and the design registered as such and same with rifles once a rifle always a rifle, once a pistol always a pistol.
 
Back
Top Bottom