Picture of the day

Saw one of these make a victory roll over 4 CMBG HQ Fort Henry after doing the annual run over the Mohne Dam near Soest. Strictly 'Verboten'!

Officers came screaming out of HQ wanting the ID and markings of the aircraft. Answer - "What aircraft, Sir?"

My favourite was the Canberra with it's beautiful camo paint scheme and slower flight.
 
Love the over under tail pipes on this bad boy.

https://2.bp.########.com/-KYxjZMmbwx4/VuF4cfovGHI/AAAAAAAABqI/Y-t5ZntaRuA/s1600/rs11516_l-f1-xm145-reheat-runs-at-warton-rsf1-2.jpg

One of my previous bosses was an ex-RAF Englishman who was working as ground crew for the Lightnings.
His eyes lit up when he talked about them. By the way, seems they leaked, a lot.
 
I had the honour of meeting a former Lightning Pilot.
He lost the use of his legs as a result of 20mm ground fire as he was taking off on a combat mission.
He mentioned among other things, that those skinny main gear tires only lasted for 3-5 landings.
A design constraint due to the thin wing profile.
 
His eyes lit up when he talked about them. By the way, seems they leaked, a lot.[/QUOTE]

It's British,even British cars all leaked a lot.
Went to see the Mynarski(spelling ??) memorial Lancaster a number of years ago when it was visiting Regina,even the freshly rebuilt Merlin engines already left the undersides of the wings covered in oil.
 
BSA motorcycles and some other British makes had the same problem-if it isn't leaking it's likely dry.

Yet they still didn't leak nearly as much as run of the mill HD :)

3563.jpg
 
His eyes lit up when he talked about them. By the way, seems they leaked, a lot.

It's British,even British cars all leaked a lot.
Went to see the Mynarski(spelling ??) memorial Lancaster a number of years ago when it was visiting Regina,even the freshly rebuilt Merlin engines already left the undersides of the wings covered in oil.[/QUOTE]

They're not "leaking", they're just "marking their spot".........(said with a tony English accent)

According to wiki, the engines were a pain in the arse to work on and the upper one liked to leak. I'm guessing the British just weren't that good at making gaskets.......:p
 
Leaky, sure, but that's just the device expelling weakness. Behold the worldly remains of poor old MM401:

raaf-mosquito-mm401.jpg


This photo was taken on February 21st, 1944. It shows what’s left of Mosquito FB Mk. VI fighter-bomber MM401, marked ‘SB-J’, of 464 Squadron, Royal Australian Air Force.

The previous night, SB-J had departed 464’s base at Hunsdon, north of London, to strike V1 launch sites in the Pas de Calais area of Northern France. She was flown by a crew from Melbourne – Squadron Leader Arthur Geoffrey Oxlade of Box Hill and his navigator Flight Lieutenant Donald McKenzie Shanks of Toorak. They were aged 24 and 35 respectively. During their attack, the aircraft was hit by a brace of German anti-aircraft artillery and one shell blew most of the starboard outer wing to pieces. But that’s not all.

Once you’re done staring open-mouthed at the starboard wing, shift your attention to the obscured left side. You’ll notice the port propeller blades and spinner are gone, and that the aircraft is resting on the caterpillar track used to move it off the runway. A second flak shell had shattered the port engine and destroyed the left landing gear in the rear of the nacelle. Perhaps the simultaneous and opposing losses of lift and power helped to hold the Mosquito on an even keel – but somehow, Oxlade managed to recover his aircraft and nurse it back across a frigid English Channel to Friston. He then set the plane down on the grass gently enough to walk away.

For a while, the Mosquito was even set to be repaired and returned to service. It was only after a more detailed damage assessment that it was written off.

Bet that made some exciting noises.
 
I always thought the SdKfz 234 was one of the slickest looking critters the Germans ever produced.

latest


Looks futuristic, even today:

Sd_Kfz_234-1_2.jpg


Puma01.jpg


Still a few extant in Germany and at Bovington:

1280px-Panzermuseum_Munster_2010_0404.JPG

they have 2 drivers positions, and IIRC they had a reversing gear box on the transmission allowing them to be driven just as fast in both directions
 
Leaky, sure, but that's just the device expelling weakness. Behold the worldly remains of poor old MM401:

raaf-mosquito-mm401.jpg




Bet that made some exciting noises.

Man the guys in that plane were seriously lucky and no doubt some pretty fantastic flying as well. More points for the wooden wonder, one engine, big chunk of wing missing and still got home. Really amazing the damage some of those planes took and still got home.
 
Anyone know if the Mosquito had counter-rotating propellers? To continue flying it, in that condition is incredibly impressive if it didn't have.

They did not. It was one of the warnings in op procedures and caught many an unwary sprog pilot by surprise. But regardless of that, with the port airscrew gone it would seem pointless in running that engine so CW or CCW rotation wouldn't matter. But still some skillful flying.
The characteristic swing associated with the Mossie was eliminated with its descendant , the Hornet, as it had handed engines.
 
They did not. It was one of the warnings in op procedures and caught many an unwary sprog pilot by surprise. But regardless of that, with the port airscrew gone it would seem pointless in running that engine so CW or CCW rotation wouldn't matter. But still some skillful flying.
The characteristic swing associated with the Mossie was eliminated with its descendant , the Hornet, as it had handed engines.

Whether it had counter-rotating props or not, certainly would matter.

Trying to maintain any sort of controlled flight with loss of your critical engine (apparently left in the DH.98s case), as well as nearly half a wing missing would certainly give you a lot more bother than if it had a counter-rotating right one.

It sure would have been mighty tempting to test out ones parachute over France in that situation.
 
Last edited:
And because Brother Dryfire mentioned her, here's a glamour photo of the Sea Hornet:

WIP35_zps120f99ee.jpg


There isn't a bad line on that airplane. It really is an aesthetic masterpiece, and fast, too.

No%20801%20Squadron%20at%20RNAS%20Ford%20West%20Sussex%20was%20the%20first%20unit%20of%20the%20Fleet%20Air%20Arm%20to%20receive%20the%20Sea%20Hornet%20in%201947...jpg


And the only civvie operator, ever, of the Hornet was Spartan Air Services of Edmonton.

https://4.bp.########.com/-nt0aap1JZ5Q/V4LBP7ji3-I/AAAAAAAACrE/tZeitvbi0_sHKXMC_B0kz_xPiLoZB--QQCLcB/s1600/Hornet.jpg

Gotta think getting parts would have been a massive PITA. Like owning a rare British sports car.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom