Picture of the day

A contender for fugliest airplane...

I kinda like it. It's out-of-the-box thinking. It's what happens when you tell a German aeronautical engineer "I bet you can't do this" and he's most of the way through a bottle of peppermint schnapps and three schnitzels.

For really truly inspired flying hideousness, for airplanes so ugly they fly via the power of the earth pushing them away from itself, we must go to the French. The Loire-Nieuport LN-40 series answers the question "Can I make a Stuka more homely?"

loire-nieuport-ln401_3.jpg


ln411-1.gif


Or the shipping crate the LN40 was delivered in, the Block MB 210:

bloch210-7.jpg


(Poor thing should see a doctor about that growth on her nose. Looks malignant.)

And although I picked on the Amiot 143 a mere 20 or so posts ago, I can't leave it out of a conversation about ugly airplanes.

amiot143-3.jpg
 
IMHO one of the ugliest stingbags ever made: Caudron G.3

Build in incredible numbers ,in many places around the world and trained pilots sometimes well into 1930s.I pity the fool charged with tensioning all those wires.

1224-1.jpg
 
In fairness to the wire-stringin sumbiches at Caudron, it was pretty early in the game. They were trying all kinds of loopy sh!t in those days.

Behold the Kennedy Giant:

Kennedy-Giant-Bomber.jpg


Unlovely in all dimensions and from every angle.

Kennedy_Giant-2.jpg


But it did keep the lads down at the lumberyard very busy indeed.
 
Not quite military, though it was demonstrated for consideration to the Italian Air-force. WAY outside the box thinking - presenting the 1933 Stipa-Caproni.


Brookwood
 
Thanks to the layout of single-engine aircraft, it's a PITA trying to give the pilot any kind of clear view out the front. We seem to have decided that tractor engines applying thrust through the center of the fuselage is the way to go. But when we go with two engines, things improve vastly. Witness the evolution of the JU 88 family.

The JU88:

11664h.jpg


7614100946_284cc53a30_b.jpg


Not bad - not much out in front to screw up the line of sight. But could be better.

The Ju188:

a9c5da6c8f262f7b69724b64c69c5912--junkers-kampf.jpg


Ju-188-%20RAF-Florence-45.jpg


Better yet - all one long curve. Positively spacious.

The Ju288:

Ju-288V103_zps0c1dc7bd.jpg


More glass yet!

The Ju 388:

Junkers_Ju_388L-1.jpg


But why the hell would you want gobs of forward vision in a bomber? Well, so you can better aim your 75 mm gun at other bombers, tanks, and random annoyances. Behold the Ju88-P1. Not many made, slow and vulnerable to fighter interception when deployed in the anti-bomber role, but about as much gun as the Ju88 could carry. Apparently there were attempts made at mounting the 88 Flak in the same spot, but they just weren't successful.

(Of course my theory regarding forward vision goes out the window (no pun intended) when they tinned in the nose on the p series attack bombers, but what the hell. :))

ju88p-17.jpg


Junkers_Ju88_P-1_Attack_bomber.jpg
 
Last edited:
OMG. How can the Brits have so many beautiful planes; and some of the ugliest? I don't which of these two is the worst, but it would hurt my brain to have to compare them...

Lets take a bit from this plane , a bit form another, throw a few special design bits in to stick them together and voila. Look what ugliness we have. Mum look what I made.
 
The Dehavilland "Dragon" Rapide of the Rhine Army Parachute Association was photo'd by the retiring RAF pilot who flew her on weekends at Sennelager, Germany. We met him at 13,000' on our way to a demo jump at Bielefeld.

He took three passes with his photo recce Hawker Hunter, each one successively slower until he was falling out of the sky with flaps and gear down. He still passed us at our top speed of 125 knots.

The image of the beautiful RAF camo Hawker Hunter is still sharp in my memory .....

BTW - he told us that after a mission, the interpreters put more value on what he saw with the naked eye rather than his pics. That always puzzled me .....
 
I think everyone knows of Ju-52 but very few know first version use to be single engined, and like many other Junkers products it resembled nothing designed before or since.

I have been looking into old Junkers machines and it looks like there use to be a lot of them buzzing around Canada before WW2. Many examples of early Junkers products ended up flying in bush and all over the country.

szseB.jpg
artifact-junkers-W34ffi.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom