.275 Rigby Ruger Hawkeye RSI Stainless: Single Malt for Twenty Bucks

very once in a while I catch myself wondering if I made the right decision on that one

Ahhh, it's all good... I have a pretty nice set of Ruger rifles right now... too many to be honest, can't figure which to pack for the island next week.
 
Why would you make such a rule?

Catch the jest but an opportunity to self justification, too busy between flying / outfitting / little kids to supply myself with a bunch of different chamberings. ;) Would rather have a bunch of different rifles in the same few chamberings, grab and go, saves a lot of money too in duplication of components for me. I do bend the rules, different cases for a couple rifles, but everything is .224/7mm/.375 bores, and only really use two chamberings guiding. My bullets are sponsored is another issue and they won’t supply me with a half dozen diameters, they give me three and that’s pretty generous, won’t bug em for more.
 
Catch the jest but an opportunity to self justification, too busy between flying / outfitting / little kids to supply myself with a bunch of different chamberings. ;) Would rather have a bunch of different rifles in the same few chamberings, grab and go, saves a lot of money too in duplication of components for me. I do bend the rules, different cases for a couple rifles, but everything is .224/7mm/.375 bores, and only really use two chamberings guiding. My bullets are sponsored is another issue and they won’t supply me with a half dozen diameters, they give me three and that’s pretty generous, won’t bug em for more.
I have been thinking about 375, 7mm. I understand the almost arbitrary way you control your gunoholism.
 
Catch the jest but an opportunity to self justification, too busy between flying / outfitting / little kids to supply myself with a bunch of different chamberings. ;) Would rather have a bunch of different rifles in the same few chamberings, grab and go, saves a lot of money too in duplication of components for me. I do bend the rules, different cases for a couple rifles, but everything is .224/7mm/.375 bores, and only really use two chamberings guiding. My bullets are sponsored is another issue and they won’t supply me with a half dozen diameters, they give me three and that’s pretty generous, won’t bug em for more.

If you load for multiple rifles in the same caliber, do the loads ever overlap or are they all different load charge and COL?
 
Picked up the No1 275 Rigby a few months ago, very happy. Then seen the 6.5 Creedmoor in RSI and grab it, now very, very happy. I blew the budget, but you go around 1 time.
 
Well written, straight from the heart. I have a Mark V Weatherby Classic I feel the same way about but doubt I could have described so well my regard for these type of old style rifles.
 
Pretty big lustrious werds being typed awn this thread.................:cool:

Post number 1 enticing 'nuff to make me find and use my old Ruger on
an overdue hunt from the doorstep.

Great informative thread.
 


May I ask is there any significant practical difference between the CRF and the push feed?​

You aren't asking me, but my 2 coppers on this question is that I don't prefer the M77 MKII's for the CRF, but rather I prefer the 3-position safety over the M77 Tang safety, and I prefer the "fit & finish" and milled parts over the M77 Hawkeye rifles.
 
I’ll add push feed in my eyes is a manufacturing cop out. Controlled feed isn’t necessary as many decent guns have shown, but it also is a nice insurance policy. Basically a the controlled feed holds and controls the round all the way into the chamber, and can’t be “stuttered”. That is if in a moment of game induced anxiety you don’t finish pushing the bolt home and try and cycle the action again, a push feed will irrecoverably jam with a double feed where as a controlled feed doesn’t care and will rechamber and fire. For those of us guiding animals like grizz for a living a push feed is a short cut I just don’t see as benefitting me, and while the controlled feed offers more than typically required it’s nice to have the best system when it’s the same price as its push feed competition. It’s more expensive to make and more difficult for manufacturers to tune, and only has one drawback which in the field is meaningless: you generally have to single feed rounds from the mag rather than putting it directly in the chamber when operating it as a single shot. There are workarounds for that too but no sense being bothered on a hunting rifle, as it’s a range Cadillac concern.
 
No such thing as a CRF single shot, or maybe it means a tight finger hold on the cartridge. Let’s play and say that’s why we prefer two barrels in parallel for such applications. The single / double argument of the same vein is rimmed, or rimless cartridges, the traditionalists and those obsessed with redundancy to the point of it being a perversion like rimmed cases for reliability of extraction.
 
Back
Top Bottom