I got a blued/walnut in 223... can't say I'm overly impressed with it. Receiver is cast, as are all the bolt guts and trigger guard/trigger parts, basically everything but the barrel is cast. Trigger was not bad, but can't be lightened further as the trigger return spring screw will hit the mag release stopping it from releasing the mag (brain dead design flaw). Opening and closing the bolt is very stiff even after I disassembled, cleaned, and smoothed things out. It appears the receiver lugs are rough and the bolt lugs are not bearing even on them based on the wear marks I'm seeing after 50 rounds. Mags are plastic and replacements are $45...meh.
It dings brass up worse then a semi on extraction which it something I've never had happen with a bolt gun before lol. And the chamber isn't very cleanly machined as there are several "lines/rings" around the brass after firing.
Barrel is ultra thin but free floated, 3 rounds before it starts shotgunning groups, but it is a hunting rifle so while 3 accurate rounds is probably acceptable, it does say something about their hammer forging and stress relief processes...not great.
Scopes have to be mounted pretty high to clear bolt handle, not my preference.
Was there anything I liked? It's comfortable to shoot, fed good from the mags, and it's not ugly. $600 is pretty close to $850 which is CZ territory which is night and day quality wise compared to these. Even some of the other budget pieces (AB3/XPR/HOWA/VANGUARD/783) at the same price or less are better value IMHO. Probably didn't help that I was shooting a 243 Vanguard and a 6.5x55 CF2 at the same time.
Sometimes you win on these budget guns, sometimes you lose lol. I'll give it one more go with 50gr pills (1/12 twist, used 55's today) but this will probably be moved to the "sell" pile.
Too bad too, as I would have grabbed another at this price in 243 or 308.