Marlin 1895 GBL model...

The 1895 SS, GS and XLR previously owned to my current GBL all have the cross-bolt safety so I'm ok with it. Prefer the half-cocked hammer position rather than using the cross-bolt safety. Just need to ensure the cross-bolt safety is off when hunting. However I use the cross-bolt safety when unloading the rifle.
 
the 1895 ss, gs and xlr previously owned to my current gbl all have the cross-bolt safety so i'm ok with it. Prefer the half-cocked hammer position rather than using the cross-bolt safety. Just need to ensure the cross-bolt safety is off when hunting. However i use the cross-bolt safety when unloading the rifle.

i too ! Rj
 
The 1895 SS, GS and XLR previously owned to my current GBL all have the cross-bolt safety so I'm ok with it. Prefer the half-cocked hammer position rather than using the cross-bolt safety. Just need to ensure the cross-bolt safety is off when hunting. However I use the cross-bolt safety when unloading the rifle.

;) i three ! JP
 
Same as above . I've never found it to be anymore trouble than any other safety . I have , over the years , seen guys forget to disengage the safety on bolt guns while trying to shoot at game . I think it's more down to familiarity with your rifle than it being an inherently bad design . YMMV .
 
Really :onCrack: your both Kidding RIGHT ! No more CHANCE ! of it being PUT ON then any other rifle such as rem - win- tikka etc jmo RJ

There is a simple flaw in your logic. True, a cross bolt safety on a marlin or winchester lever has no more chance of accidentally being knocked "on safe" statistically than the bolt guns mentioned. However, the location of most conventional "behind the protruding bolt handle and tucked under the scope" of most bolts are naturally a little more resistant to being "bumped" than one protruding from the flat side of a receiver where a natural side carry position can press that button against your side or pack.

Also, those bolt guns, when carried loaded are carried with the safety "on", or at least I hope. But the difference is I expect it to be on. I know it is. So when I lift the rifle at a bounding deer, I naturally turn it off with my thumb as I bring the rifle to bear. No problems.

When I lift a lever gun to shoot, my thumb naturally cocks the hammer effectively turning off the active "safety". So now I need to disengage 2 safeties? Or at least check to see if the "extra redundancy" has inadvertently been activated? If that little button has gotten bumped, I get a click. That happened to me twice with my Winchester 94. Never used the cross bolt, yet it found itself on and cost me 2 shots at game. If I have to stop and verify 2 safeties I lose the whole fast handling advantage I value my levers for. A piece of shrink tube on the button and a Lyman aperture sight(protrudes almost down to the safety and protects it) solved that problem.

My Marlin 1895 immediately had a "delete" added. This isn't armchair quarterbacking. This is a real problem for guys that prefer to carry a lever with the hammer down on "half ####" and actually hunt the "thick brush" and use these rifles hard.
 
That's the same rail and sight system I went with on my GBL. In addition, I have a Hi-Lux 2-7x32 long eye relief scope. From a local friend and site member, that's hot & heavy into casting, I've obtained a wide selection of cast bullets. I also have acquired a small selection of jacketed, my favorite of which is the Remington 405gr.
What does your GBL weigh with the XS sights?
 
45-70 GBL with xs sight system (full rail, peep and front sight)

45-70.jpg


Lee 459-405-HB & 457-405-F (both sized to 458
4570.jpg



results using lee mold, 457-405-F (not my shooting, was done by a friend who can shoot better than I can)

45-70-50y.jpg

What does your GBL weigh with just the XS sights?
 
There is a simple flaw in your logic. True, a cross bolt safety on a marlin or winchester lever has no more chance of accidentally being knocked "on safe" statistically than the bolt guns mentioned. However, the location of most conventional "behind the protruding bolt handle and tucked under the scope" of most bolts are naturally a little more resistant to being "bumped" than one protruding from the flat side of a receiver where a natural side carry position can press that button against your side or pack.

Also, those bolt guns, when carried loaded are carried with the safety "on", or at least I hope. But the difference is I expect it to be on. I know it is. So when I lift the rifle at a bounding deer, I naturally turn it off with my thumb as I bring the rifle to bear. No problems.

When I lift a lever gun to shoot, my thumb naturally cocks the hammer effectively turning off the active "safety". So now I need to disengage 2 safeties? Or at least check to see if the "extra redundancy" has inadvertently been activated? If that little button has gotten bumped, I get a click. That happened to me twice with my Winchester 94. Never used the cross bolt, yet it found itself on and cost me 2 shots at game. If I have to stop and verify 2 safeties I lose the whole fast handling advantage I value my levers for. A piece of shrink tube on the button and a Lyman aperture sight(protrudes almost down to the safety and protects it) solved that problem.

My Marlin 1895 immediately had a "delete" added. This isn't armchair quarterbacking. This is a real problem for guys that prefer to carry a lever with the hammer down on "half ####" and actually hunt the "thick brush" and use these rifles hard.

Agree 100%....don’t like the cross bolt safety. That said for those more challenged letting the hammer down, I can see the upside. Definitely not for me tho.
 
Sigh...... lol.

I love the observations that guys who don’t mind the CBS must be somehow “challenged” or not “actually hunt the thick brush”, or “use their rifle hard”


You can just tighten the set screw if it’s that much of a problem for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom