I'm not the type to own too many firearms.
I am not looking to get into an AR for sport, as well as a good 308 for hunting.
My current Savage 110 308 doesn't eat my Norinco 7.62x51 very well either.
I have the majority saved up for the BCL 102, but I am fearing it may get reclassified.
I understand the reason why it is not restricted (Pre "AR" designation, slightly different functionality, etc)
However, people have been burned before with rifles being reclassified.
Essentially, it is still up to RCMP to try to get it reclassified, despite current classification criteria.
So, is there much risk in ordering the BCL 102, and in a few years, not being able to hunt with it?
If it is low risk, then the last thing for me to check is balance while shooting from standing position.
I am not looking to get into an AR for sport, as well as a good 308 for hunting.
My current Savage 110 308 doesn't eat my Norinco 7.62x51 very well either.
I have the majority saved up for the BCL 102, but I am fearing it may get reclassified.
I understand the reason why it is not restricted (Pre "AR" designation, slightly different functionality, etc)
However, people have been burned before with rifles being reclassified.
Essentially, it is still up to RCMP to try to get it reclassified, despite current classification criteria.
So, is there much risk in ordering the BCL 102, and in a few years, not being able to hunt with it?
If it is low risk, then the last thing for me to check is balance while shooting from standing position.


















































