Lithgow F90 Rumor

Correct, but from what I understand the first batch of Canadian guns are sitting in Australia waiting for our FRT to drop...

Not to be a naysayer but the RCMP has had this under review since last year spring if I am not mistaken, so it seems obvious that it’s dragging slowly with no rush to decide.

gadget
 
Is the original Aug prohibited by name? If so, then we can assume there is no chance we can ever see this, as they will be a variant of a named prohib.
 
Is the original Aug prohibited by name? If so, then we can assume there is no chance we can ever see this, as they will be a variant of a named prohib.

Not necessarily. On their website Lithgow states it is an entirely new bullpup design which should, in theory, be able to be classified as an entirely new firearm but who knows with the RCMP.
 
Not necessarily. On their website Lithgow states it is an entirely new bullpup design which should, in theory, be able to be classified as an entirely new firearm but who knows with the RCMP.

Lets hope. They could still consider it a varient, but likely not if they follow their own guidelines.
 
Lets hope. They could still consider it a varient, but likely not if they follow their own guidelines.

It’s a matter of time, it’s semi, it’s black, it’s centre fired, oh it’s a gun, therefore it’s in the proverbial crosshairs.
 
Not necessarily. On their website Lithgow states it is an entirely new bullpup design which should, in theory, be able to be classified as an entirely new firearm but who knows with the RCMP.
Lets hope. They could still consider it a varient, but likely not if they follow their own guidelines.


That AP80 has no parts compatibility with a real AK yet it is classified as a variant.
I think the Lithgow will be classed similarly based on appearance alone.
But maybe I'm just being a pessimist. They classed the Type 81 NR after all. I guess we'll see...
 
That AP80 has no parts compatibility with a real AK yet it is classified as a variant.
I think the Lithgow will be classed similarly based on appearance alone.
But maybe I'm just being a pessimist. They classed the Type 81 NR after all. I guess we'll see...

The AP80 was actually banned as a variant of a named .22 AK, not a x39 AK. That is what allowed the AP80 to get caught despite the lack of compatible parts shared with a true x39 AK rifle.
 
That AP80 has no parts compatibility with a real AK yet it is classified as a variant.
I think the Lithgow will be classed similarly based on appearance alone.
But maybe I'm just being a pessimist. They classed the Type 81 NR after all. I guess we'll see...

Identical and from the same assembly line as the Mitchell Arms AK22.

The Mitchell Arms AK22 is named in the OIC as prohibited.

AP80 is thus a mechanical variant of a named prohibited firearm.

Understand what guns are on the "AK" list. Politicians classed the AK22 as prohib by appearance.... not the lab.
 
Back
Top Bottom