Wolverine's WK180-C

Status
Not open for further replies.
Still very excited about getting mine! Weeoooo!

Good to hear about testing and production going well! Maybe I'll have mine in time for my B-day!
 
So that's bflies in the middle holding the rifle? Lmao ok.

Can't wait for these to get to market.

You literally are what your name suggests. Play. Soccer. A round ball that gets kick

So you are trying to bash Yuri now!?!?! Don't worry your stupidity will soon show its true pink colour

Be careful not too use too much of mommy's bandwidth cuz she might charge you more for rent or kick you out of the basement ;-)
 
Last edited:
I handled one a TacCom for a bit. I was pleasantly surprised by the feel and ergos. It's like an unsophisticated AR-15 in a no nonsense kind of way. Almost like it was designed to be a cheaper and easier to produce rifle that that AR -15 eh.

I liked it. Hope to get to shoot one sometime.
 
I handled one a TacCom for a bit. I was pleasantly surprised by the feel and ergos. It's like an unsophisticated AR-15 in a no nonsense kind of way. Almost like it was designed to be a cheaper and easier to produce rifle that that AR -15 eh.

I liked it. Hope to get to shoot one sometime.

How heavy did it feel?
 
How heavy did it feel?

Definitely not a powder puff. I already took advantage of Bushnell's March rebate and have a 3-9x40 AR223 waiting to mount on mine when it arrives, and fully expect it to be heavy enough to have the recoil of a Ruger 10/22.
They had a dummy heavy barrel on it at TACCOM, so it really depends on how much they whittle down the production version.
I'm ambivalent about it, since a heavy barrel might be better for coyotes, but I like the balance of a lighter barrel.
 
Definitely not a powder puff. I already took advantage of Bushnell's March rebate and have a 3-9x40 AR223 waiting to mount on mine when it arrives, and fully expect it to be heavy enough to have the recoil of a Ruger 10/22.
They had a dummy heavy barrel on it at TACCOM, so it really depends on how much they whittle down the production version.
I'm ambivalent about it, since a heavy barrel might be better for coyotes, but I like the balance of a lighter barrel.

Hey Bubba Yugga....I'm doing pretty much the same with mine when it comes except I'm going with the 4.5-18 AR223. Also a Burris AR332 Prism sight with a Fastfire lll red dot on the side will be going on this bad boy for in close action. What do you plan on using for a mount on the Bushnell? Yotes near and far look out!
 
Last edited:
Couple of cheap rings came with the scope, so will start with that.
Been thinking about a couple 45 pic adapters for flip up UTG BUIS, or maybe one for a cheap reflex red dot.
Wanna start low end and work up as experience unfolds.
Always got an SKS or two to inherit the hand me downs...
 
Originally Posted by Mr Wolverine View Post
Don't worry I also like the reversible charging handle, especial as there is no bolt release catch. We will conduct a poll as I am interested to hear everyone's point of view, but I am not bound to make a change due to any poll. The only change that may happen is a lighter profile barrel but I need to conduct some accuracy tests before committing to that. My original concept was for an affordable, lightweight, reliable, utility carbine that owners could easily customise. I am determined not to loose sight of that.

I don't get why the medium heavy barrel is a bad thing. It's not much more weight and you gain in recoil management and accuracy
 
The only change that may happen is a lighter profile barrel but I need to conduct some accuracy tests before committing to that. My original concept was for an affordable, lightweight, reliable, utility carbine that owners could easily customise. I am determined not to loose sight of that.
Put the cheapest barrel on it possible, it's going in the garbage anyways when I change caliber
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom